Open source traffic analysis

ABA Home
U.S. Supreme

Supreme Court Rules Against State Worker’s Equal Protection Claim

Posted Jun 9, 2008, 10:33 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

The U.S. Supreme Court has rejected a “class of one” equal protection claim by a worker who says she was fired from her state job because of discrimination.

The 6-3 decision (PDF posted by SCOTUSblog) said Anup Engquist cannot bring such a claim unless she was a member of a class targeted for discrimination, the Associated Press reports. The majority opinion by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. said the “class of one” theory does not apply in the public employment context.

Roberts said the government has broad powers as an employer. “Although government employees do not lose their constitutional rights when they accept their positions, those rights must be balanced against the realities of the employment context,” he wrote.

The case is Engquist v. Oregon Department of Agriculture.

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/supreme_court_rules_against_state_workers_equal_protection_claim/

Title: Supreme Court Rules Against State Worker’s Equal Protection Claim


Comments

    Be the first to comment.


Commenting has expired on this post.


Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.





Are you an ABA Member? Read This First

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top