Open source traffic analysis

ABA Home
U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court Turns Down Fantasy Baseball Case

Posted Jun 2, 2008, 11:01 am CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a case that asks whether fantasy baseball leagues have a First Amendment right to use the names and statistics of famous athletes.

The decision lets stand a ruling by the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that said a fantasy league had a free speech right to use the information, the Associated Press reports.

“The information used in … fantasy baseball games is all readily available in the public domain, and it would be strange law that a person would not have a First Amendment right to use information that is available to everyone,” the appeals court had said.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear the case could encourage other websites to incorporate the use famous people without getting their permission, the Los Angeles Times reported in a preview of the case. The story cites estimates that 15 million people spend about $1.5 billion a year playing fantasy sports.

The case is Major League Baseball Advanced Media v. C.B.C. It got some early notoriety on April 1, when a blogger reported as part of an April Fool’s joke that the court had accepted the case, but three justices recused themselves because of participation in fantasy leagues.

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/supreme_court_turns_down_fantasy_baseball_case/

Title: Supreme Court Turns Down Fantasy Baseball Case


Comments

    Be the first to comment.


Commenting has expired on this post.


Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.





Are you an ABA Member? Read This First

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top