Teen Traffic Hearings are Too Often Ugly in Massachusetts

Trials & Litigation

Teen Traffic Hearings are Too Often Ugly in Massachusetts

Posted Aug 15, 2008, 12:59 pm CST
By Martha Neil

Anger. Pouting. Arguments. Insults.

Such tactics—by parents, as well as teens—are all too common in Massachusetts these days, as a growing number of fledgling drivers are ticketed under a tough new statute. Known as the junior operator law, it imposes a mandatory 90-day suspension for an initial speeding offense, if the driver is under 18, as well as a $500 fine. It also requires the teen to get additional driver training and pass a driver's license test a second time, reports the Boston Globe.

Not surprisingly, ticketed teens are upset about the prospect of losing their driving privileges almost as soon as they are allowed to get behind the wheel, and having to continue serving as a teen chauffeur is hard on suburban parents, in particular. The junior operator law, as well as stepped-up drunken driving enforcement, is credited with nearly doubling the number of traffic hearings at the Registry of Motor Vehicles over the past two years, substantially increasing the workload for those who handle these cases, the newspaper says.

Hearing officers have no choice but to suspend licenses under the new law, if it is violated, and they often are the bearer of bad news to teens and parents who were unaware of the stringent new requirements. The new law is believed to be saving lives by helping teens to be better drivers, but those ticketed aren't necessarily appreciative.

"Vulgar language—right in front of their parents," recounts Deana Douville, an RMV hearing officer in Springfield, of an all-too-common experience. "That's usually when I end it. I end the hearing at that point. You kind of look at the parents like—I couldn't imagine kids talking in front of their parents like that."

Comments

Report Abuse

Posted by W - 3 months, 2 weeks, 2 days, 15 hours, 14 minutes ago

Little towns with cryptic speed limit signs (“thickly settled” is Massachusetts talk for 30 mph) and cops hiding in the bushes with radar guns - duh, what did they expect. So now, the teens will just drive without a license and insurance. Great plan Massachusetts. I am glad we don’t live there anymore.
Posted by Esq-to-be - 3 months, 2 weeks, 2 days, 13 hours, 29 minutes ago

I’m so glad for this law in Mass. Drivers here do not know how to drive and teens text while driving routinely here. This is a great lesson for them to learn—drive poorly, loose your privilege!
Posted by Miriam null - 3 months, 2 weeks, 2 days, 30 minutes ago

Ah, those poor deprived kids! maybe they should try to learn the lessons of good driving and not be smart-asses. A little cold water on their expectations may be the medicine they need.
Posted by Ms.Golightly - 3 months, 1 week, 6 days, 21 hours, 20 minutes ago

What a shame what these kids have to go through. Speeding is one thing… However, they should just get two points… Not a removal of license. Thus, this new law makes it rather more of a struggle for the parents than the kids since it is they, who are the ones that must pay the $500 fine. What is the speed limit over there? They should enforce that lawhere in New York against violent cab drivers… That, right there, would make a much larger city far more safer.

Commenting has expired on this post.

ABA Journal - Law News Now

Trials & Litigation