Open source traffic analysis

ABA Home
Law Firms

Treasury Offers $11M ‘Bailout Love’ to Hughes Hubbard and Squire Sanders

Posted Nov 4, 2008, 06:56 pm CST
By Martha Neil

Economic crisis has brought big-bucks government contracts to two well-known law firms.

Hughes Hubbard & Reed and Squire Sanders & Dempsey have each been awarded $5.5 million contracts to help approximately 2,000 financial firms apply for a share of the money being spent by the U.S. Treasury Department under a federal bailout plan expected to cost taxpayers some $750 billion, reports Reuters.

Termed "bailout love" by the Above the Law blog, the government contracts with the law firms are linked to an AmLaw daily post about the Treasury largesse.

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/treasury_offers_11m_bailout_love_to_hughes_hubbard_and_squire_sanders/

Title: Treasury Offers $11M ‘Bailout Love’ to Hughes Hubbard and Squire Sanders


Comments

  1. Posted by PAN - 2 months, 3 days, 11 hours, 13 minutes ago

    The issue of the appropriateness of hourly billing is finally solved!

  2. Posted by george - 2 months, 1 day, 16 hours, 4 minutes ago

    What a scam by the government and these two law firms!

    Our tax dollars are going to pay rich ivy leauge lawyers bail out their rich ivy league banker friends.

    These CEO’s need to be going to jail!!!!!!!

    The accountants and lawyers who worked on these projects need to be disbared as well.!

  3. Posted by apartner - 2 months, 1 day, 15 hours, 28 minutes ago

    Neither HH nor SSD did much subprime or other securitization work.  They’re both excellent firm with experience with bank capital transactions, so it’s a good choice.

  4. Posted by Ed Weber - 2 months, 1 day, 14 hours, 36 minutes ago

    I am a sole practictioner and I just got a notice of disconnection of my phone service because I failed to pay last month’s phone bill within 30 days due to a simple over cite.  I have excellent credit and this is the first time in 37 years of practice that I haven’t paid my phone bill within 30 days.  And then I have to read this fat cat welfare artricle.  Why aren’t lawyer’s in the streets like Pakistan’s legal community??

  5. Posted by Incredulous - 2 months, 1 day, 14 hours, 27 minutes ago

    This is unbelivably amazing.  The financial firms are unable to even APPLY for aid themselves? Or they cannot use their in-house counsel to apply for them?  Why is this money being wasted?  There should be an investigation of this “love” and the law firms should be disparaged publicly until they give the money back to the taxpayers.  And people wonder why we have a deficit and government spending is through the roof?

  6. Posted by Mad - 2 months, 1 day, 14 hours, 13 minutes ago

    What a joke.  Why is my tax dollars being spent on these two law firms salaries?

    Enough is enough

  7. Posted by AB - 2 months, 1 day, 13 hours, 23 minutes ago

    The firms are representing the government, not the applicants.  The price tag does seem high, but would it be better for the USG to hire a solo practitioner to assist with these transactions?  Or perhaps they shouldn’t even use lawyers at all?

  8. Posted by tpp - 2 months, 1 day, 12 hours, 59 minutes ago

    Pigs at the trough.

  9. Posted by wall street amnesty - 2 months, 1 day, 12 hours, 56 minutes ago

    People aren’t upset at the big firms being used here.  We are upset that our tax dollars are being used to pay both the plaintiff and defendant’s legal bills.

    When is the USG going to hire a special prosecutor to sue the CEO, the Board, the lawyers, accountants of Freddie, Fannie, Lehman, etc to recover the cost of all this.  I want to see those guys either paying back this money, bankrupt and homeless, or in jail.

  10. Posted by Sara V - 2 months, 1 day, 12 hours, 9 minutes ago

    Hey guys,

    Are you sending these excellent comments to your senators and reps in DC?  It’s not enough to complain to a blog!

  11. Posted by ME - 2 months, 1 day, 10 hours, 48 minutes ago

    I am not a banking lawyer so I am curious to know what the basis of the prosecution would be.  Breach of fiduciary duty would need have to be brought by shareholders, I believe.  Fraud?  Intentional infliction of emotional distress on the whole country?

  12. Posted by DH - 1 month, 4 weeks, 11 hours, 24 minutes ago

    Touche Sara V.  You can go to the site below to share your vision with the new administration.  http://change.gov/page/s/yourvision


Commenting has expired on this post.



Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.



Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top