ABA Home
Trials & Litigation

US: Immigrant Goes, $49 K in Savings Stays

Posted Oct 10, 2007, 01:32 pm CDT
By Martha Neil

After nearly a decade of washing dishes in a Florida restaurant, Pedro Zapeta had saved $62,000. He reportedly lived a frugal life, bicycling everywhere and denying himself all luxuries once he paid for his rent and electricity. No one questions that his savings come from his own hard-earned wages.

However, because the illegal immigrant failed to report his savings on the proper form before he tried to board a plane to return to his native Guatemala in 2005, customs agents confiscated his money and a federal judge decided that the U.S. government should keep $49,000 as a civil penalty. "The 'crime' he's being punished for is not illegal immigration. It's a bureaucratic technicality meant to catch drug dealers and smugglers, of which he is neither," writes a Miami Herald columnist.

Zapeta's situation, which has been reported by the Palm Beach Post and in a CNN broadcast, has ignited controversy. Many are outraged, but some opponents of illegal immigration say he got what he deserved, writes columnist Ana Menendez. Ironically, she notes, "most Americans are deep in the red" and Zapeta "may be the last man on earth who still embodies the great American ideal of thrift and hard work."

E-Mail This Story


(Separate multiple addresses with a comma.)




Share This Story

URL to share: http://www.abajournal.com/news/us_immigrant_goes_49000_in_savings_stays/

Title: US: Immigrant Goes, $49 K in Savings Stays


Comments

  1. Posted by J.D. - 10 months, 3 weeks, 3 days, 10 hours, 22 minutes ago

    Why is it that all immigration articles begin with overly-dramatic sob stories?

    How about a statistic on exactly how much money this guy owes in back taxes? If you do your research, you learn that he owes MUCH more than $50 K to the government.

    If we want things like this to stop, we need to start enforcing immigration laws. He would never have been hired, never have been exploited, and never would have been in the country.

    But the ABA along with the ACLU, AILA, MALDEF and others have created this situation themselves.


Commenting has expired on this post.


Subscribe

Get the ABA Journal the way you want it — in print, online, by e-mail — and when you want it — monthly, weekly, daily or as news breaks.





Are you an ABA Member? Read This First

Subscribe via RSS
Subscribe to the mobile edition
Subscribe to the monthly magazine


Return to top