Legal Ethics
Wife of 9th Circuit Chief Judge Says Her Husband Is ‘Not Into Porn’
Posted Jun 16, 2008, 10:46 am CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Updated: The wife of Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals says her husband “is not into porn” and the few racy materials on a computer he used are nothing more than “raunchy humor.”
Marcy Tiffany defends her husband in a post on the blog Patterico’s Pontifications. She says materials of a sexual nature constituted a “tiny percentage” of the material posted on a server that her husband shared with other family members. Cathy Catterson, the circuit and court of appeals executive for the 9th Circuit, confirmed that Kozinski’s wife wrote the post.
Tiffany, who has been married to Kozinski for more than 30 years, takes issue with a Los Angeles Times report that said the sexually explicit material on the website was extensive. “The fact is, Alex is not into porn—he is into funny—and sometimes funny has a sexual character,” she wrote.
Tiffany says the Times article “includes graphic descriptions that make the material sound like hard-core porn when, in fact, it is more accurately described as raunchy humor.”
There is a “hodgepodge” or more than 300 items in the server’s “stuff” folder, she says, but only about a half dozen have a sexual aspect. Elsewhere on the server are also family photos, children’s school papers and Kozinski’s articles.
She charges that the Times story that broke the news of sexually explicit materials “is riddled with half-truths, gross mischaracterizations and outright lies.” Kozinski recused himself from a Los Angeles pornography case following the Times' revelations.
An ABA Journal reporter toured the website last month and also found more than a dozen mp3 music files, some of which were copyrighted. Most were songs by the parodist Weird Al Yankovic.
The Times article describes a “video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal.” Tiffany characterizes it as “a widely available video of a man trying to relieve himself [in] a field when he is attacked by a donkey he fights off with one hand while trying to hold up his pants with the other.”
She also defends the material on “women’s crotches” as one of the many “camel toe” series that is widely available on the net.
She maintains it’s wrong to describe the materials stored on her family’s file server as a “website.” Her husband didn’t remember some of the files, she said, and didn’t know if he or one of his sons had put them there. Kozinski’s son, Yale, has said he maintained the server that contained the sexually explicit pictures, and it was intended to be private.
Los Angeles Times spokesman David Lauter issued a statement defending its articles about Kozinski, saying they were "fair and accurate and raised important issues on a matter of significant public concern." Lauter says the newspaper gave Kozinski a chance to respond once the matter became newsworthy and included his comments.
Tiffany also criticizes lawyer Cyrus Sanai, who says he told told the Los Angeles Times and other reporters about the files. She calls Sanai “a disgruntled attorney/litigant” who targeted her husband because he defended a 9th Circuit panel that refused to allow federal courts to assume jurisdiction in the divorce case for Sanai's parents. She also alleges that Sanai has been criticized in other cases for filing baseless pleadings and abusing the legal process.
“This is a sad and dangerous lesson to anyone who dares to stand on principle and publicly speak out against people like Cyrus Sanai, who are willing to stop at nothing to wreak his petty vengeance on a good and decent man like my husband.”
Asked for comment, Sanai told ABAJournal.com he believes Tiffany did not write the post without input from Kozinski. “He’s using his wife as a sock puppet, or perhaps more respectfully, his attorney,” Sanai said. “This has clearly been directed by him.”
Sanai says he has not filed baseless pleadings or abused the legal process and that one judge who criticized him was removed from the case. He says he found the sexual materials on Kozinski’s website in an effort to find documents that Kozinski had posted referencing the divorce case of Sanai's father.
Sanai maintains Kozinski should not have posted the documents or linked to them in the online version of a legal newspaper article that Kozinski wrote in 2005 disagreeing with Sanai's views on the citation of unpublished opinions.
“The response is not and never has been an analysis of the facts but vicious personal attacks on me,” Sanai said. “Instead, like her husband, she engages in repetitive ad hominem attacks to distract attention from the underlying legal issues. In that respect, she’s learned from a master.”
Updated at 1:30 p.m. on 06-16-2008 to include comments from Sanai and at 4:25 p.m. to include comments from the Los Angeles Times spokesman.
Commenting has expired on this post.
Comments
Posted by bjc - 6 months, 3 weeks, 1 day, 13 hours, 51 minutes ago
Do we really care what this judge does on his own time? He is faithful to his wife and son, and is scholarly. I personally wouldn’t care if he was “into porn”, as long as he doesn’t flout it publicly. What kind of prudes worry about this stuff? A little excitement certainly is verboten around here.
Posted by msg - 6 months, 3 weeks, 1 day, 5 hours, 29 minutes ago
I am curious - is this guy a republican? Could be another left-wing conspiracy!
Posted by Heiko - 6 months, 3 weeks, 15 hours, 41 minutes ago
Groklaw.org asks if obtaining pictures and other files from a private server is the real problem here. Who allowed Sanai to browse the files on that server without permission? Even if the protection measures were not sufficient, are you allowed to enter your neighbours house through the open front door and browse through his documents?
Strange ....
Posted by Independent - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 15 hours, 59 minutes ago
His actions have made all judges look bad in the public’s eyes. As a result, he should be removed.
Posted by A male attorney - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 14 hours, 45 minutes ago
I think I speak for men everywhere when I say that ware “not into porn.”
Posted by Anon - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 11 hours, 47 minutes ago
I’m glad that his wife wrote a response, whether she was prompted to by her husband. Her version sounds more accurate than what was reported in the LATimes. You can’t always believe what you read—or maybe there are two ways to look at any issue. In this case, I can very easily see how a disgruntled lawyer might try to set him up—and the pictures as described in her posting—do not seem like porn AT ALL. You might not like his sense of humor, but the site was not intended for the public to access. Who trusts the media anymore to report fairly and accurately anyway?
Posted by agitated - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 11 hours, 13 minutes ago
If the FBI doesn’t look into this, every average joe citizen who gets arrested for porn on their computer will have a legitimate complaint about selective enforcement. It may well be that he didn’t break any laws, but the perception that he is above the law as a presidential appointee must be dealt with swiftly, or the public will be outraged.
Posted by 7b - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 10 hours, 25 minutes ago
@ Independent (perhaps Atty. Sanai?): What actions, pray tell?
I think it’s fairly obvious that Sanai’s accusations & the LA Times article were factually inaccurate & malicious. At the very worst, Kozinski is guilty of having an off-color sense of humor.
Posted by what? - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 10 hours, 20 minutes ago
I may not be the most computer literate person, but how in the world did Sanai get into the “stuff” folder on a judge’s personal computer?
Posted by V - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 7 hours, 47 minutes ago
What should the FBI investigate? There’s no crime, just media-induced moral indignation at private behavior.
If our public servants must be “pure” then expect it to lead to a culture where those puritans do what puritans do and impose their purity upon the populace.
Posted by GJG - 6 months, 2 weeks, 5 days, 7 hours, 10 minutes ago
Sounds like the judge was appointed by Clinton
Posted by comncents - 6 months, 2 weeks, 4 days, 4 hours ago
Hello…9th circuit!
Posted by SLB - 6 months, 2 weeks, 2 days, 10 hours, 21 minutes ago
Note to 2 previous posters: Alex Kozinski is an extremely well-known conservative appointee to the 9th Cir. Republicans have discussed him as a potential future Supreme Court nominee. I don’t agree with his politics. However, he writes some fairly humorous opinions.