Constitutional Law

Chief District Judge Nixes Motion to Vacate Prop 8 Ruling Due to Judge Walker's Sexual Orientation

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Print.

The chief federal district judge in San Francisco has refused to vacate a controversial same-sex marriage ruling last year by a now-retired colleague, based on his sexual orientation and involvement in a same-sex relationship.

A judge is not required to step down from hearing a case simply because of his or her personal situation, ruled Judge James Ware today, reports the Christian Science Monitor.

“The fact that a federal judge shares a fundamental characteristic with a litigant, or shares membership in a large association such as a religion, has been categorically rejected by federal courts as a sole basis for requiring a judge to recuse her or himself,” said Ware in his written opinion.

Ware heard the motion to vacate because he is handling cases for now-retired former Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker. However, Ware’s ruling upholding Walker’s decision striking down the Proposition 8 ballot measure banning same-sex marriage is not expected to be the final answer in the case, because Walker’s decision has already been appealed to a higher court.

Articles in the New York Times and the Oakland Blog of the San Francisco Chronicle also discuss today’s ruling.

Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.