Patent lawsuits drop 21 percent in the Eastern District of Texas as SCOTUS ruling brings new era
The Sam B. Hall Jr. U.S. Courthouse in Marshall, Texas. Photo by Billy Hathorn, via Wikimedia Commons.
Patent lawsuits in the federal court for the Eastern District of Texas are on the decline as a result of a May ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court.
The decision, TC Heartland v. Kraft Food Brands Group, is “ushering in a new era for the place America has gone to settle disputes about inventions,” Texas Lawbook (sub. req.) reports. The Eastern District of Texas is considered a plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction and was the top jurisdiction for patent infringement suits.
The May 22 decision interpreted a venue statute and narrowed the locations where patent infringement suits can be filed. The ruling said the word “resides” requires suits filed under that prong of the statute to be filed in the state where the company is incorporated. The patent law also allows businesses to file patent suits in a district where a company being sued has a regular and established place of business.
In the first half of 2017, patent lawsuits filed in the Eastern District of Texas dropped 21.3 percent from the same period last year, according to data from Lex Machina cited by Texas Lawbook. In the same period, patent cases in the District of Delaware, where many companies are incorporated, jumped 71 percent.
Filings in the 21 days after TC Heartland changed dramatically in the Eastern District. In the prior time period, the Eastern District of Texas accounted for 36 percent of the 275 patent cases filed nationwide. Afterward the district accounted for 14 percent of the 213 patent cases filed across the country.
The District of Delaware had 8 percent of the cases filed nationwide before TC Heartland, and 22 percent of the cases filed afterward.
ABA Journal: “Supreme Court makes venue shopping harder for patent trolls”