Law Practice Management
Why WolfBlock Didn’t Merge to Survive
Posted Mar 24, 2009 4:58 PM CST
By Martha Neil
Like other well-known law firms that have suddenly imploded, WolfBlock focused in recent months and years on finding a merger partner.
But it never succeeded, and the partnership voted yesterday to wind up the more than 100-year-old law firm's affairs. Three issues raised by the 300-attorney Philadelphia-based firm, at least in its failed merger talks with Akerman Senterfitt and Cozen O'Connor, may have doomed the effort to combine forces with another firm, according to the Philadelphia Daily News:
First, WolfBlock had a large unfunded pension liability that had to be dealt with. Second, agreement had to be reached on how to address a substantial tax impact on WolfBlock partners if the firm's fiscal year changed (it currently ends on Jan. 31). And, third, a new law firm name, if any, must begin with "Wolf," the firm insisted.
Meanwhile, despite the firm's glorious past, it had seemingly lost momentum in recent years.
Despite its pedigree and reputation for skillful handling of complex real estate deals, the firm essentially lacked a workable plan for surviving, as a midsize firm in a dismal economy, against bigger and more specialized competitors, writes the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Then, after merger talks failed, the firm began losing partners, the newspaper writes.
"When you start to get a steady stream of defections going on over a period of one, two, three years, and they come from different areas of the practice, that's a sign of trouble," says Robert Denney, a legal consultant based in Wayne, Pa. "When I read about and heard about the two failed mergers, that's just a sign there's something wrong there."
Comparing WolfBlock to the former Wanamaker's department store chain which has been absorbed by competitors, professor Lawrence Hamermesh of Widener University School of Law recalled that he applied for a job there as he was graduating from law school. "It had a storied reputation as a powerful law firm that was politically well-connected," he tells the Wilmington, Del., News Journal.
Among the well-known names in the firm's Wilmington office is former Del. Attorney General Charles Oberly III. He and other Delaware attorneys on WolfBlock's roster are expected to go to Drinker Biddle & Reath, as discussed in an earlier ABAJournal.com post, although this has not been confirmed by anyone involved.
Many of the WolfBlock lawyers in Philadelphia are expected to go to Cozen O'Connor.
Job-hunting will be difficult for WolfBlock staff members and lawyers who don't have a book of business, observers predict.
But "I would say that for lawyers with solid business generation, they are going to be highly sought after. "For those that don't, they likely will have a hard time, unless they are part of a group," former Duane Morris chairman Sheldon Bonovitz tells the Philadelphia Inquirer.
Additional coverage:
ABAJournal.com: "WolfBlock Partners Vote to Dissolve; Many May Be Headed to Cozen O’Connor"
Updated at 7:42 p.m. to include information from most recent Philadelphia Inquirer article.

Comments
B. McLeod
Mar 24, 2009 11:17 PM CST
The firm that cried “Wolf.” There you go. A merger just couldn’t be worthwhile if the resulting firm didn’t start with “Wolf.” Better to go out of existence, than not be known as “Wolf.” So, now they are all going to be at firms that don’t even have “Wolf” in the name. It’s hard to see the principled position here (or even anything rational). They’re a pack of something, I guess.
Flag this comment
tim
Mar 25, 2009 6:20 AM CST
Strong law firms don’t need to merge. Only firms who are run by weak and incompetent leaders and who no idea how to run a profitable business need to merge.
Flag this comment
emnemeth@varnumlaw.com;deposkey@varnumlaw.com
Mar 25, 2009 6:24 AM CST
Reason number 1 is interesting.
Flag this comment
hank wilson
Mar 27, 2009 7:03 AM CST
Unfunded pension liability. Taking current income to pay non-income producing partners is always a recipe for disaster.
Flag this comment
Kalifornia Arnold
Mar 27, 2009 8:50 AM CST
You could say wolf couldn’t pack them in (now the attorneys involved really have something to howl about)—The disappointment must be great but when it comes to swallowing their pride, these attorneys will just have to wolf it down
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Mar 27, 2009 8:58 AM CST
Usually, when you hear the wolves are at the door, they’re wanting in, not out.
Flag this comment
Ignatz Ratzkywatzky
Mar 27, 2009 1:01 PM CST
Perhaps they should have tried ” Solis-Cohn ” which is a much more distingushed name anyway.
Flag this comment
Joe
Apr 3, 2009 3:34 PM CST
Unfunded pension liability? WOW—that’s a phrase that should send shivers down a few spines. Somebody needs a lawyer!
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.