Legal Ethics
New Rules for Dealing With Federal Judges Who Have Issues
Posted Mar 11, 2008, 01:34 pm CST
By Martha Neil
Updated: New rules adopted today by the Judicial Conference of the United States for the first time provide uniform national standards for dealing with federal judges whose health or behavior may interfere with their ability to perform their jobs.
The rules (PDF)—which, unlike prior standards, are binding—"cover such topics as complaint initiation and review, venue, confidentiality and publication, remedies, the conduct of investigations, and the rights and roles of participants in the process," the conference explains in a press release.
The rules, which were developed after nearly four years of study, "dispense with a hodgepodge of practices the judicial circuits have developed over time to process complaints and replace them with a uniform system monitored by the conference's Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability," reports the Legal Times, in an article written before the new rules were approved today.
They take effect in 30 days.
Final orders in the relatively rare cases in which federal judges have been disciplined will now routinely be made public, notes the Associated Press.
Updated at 4:50 p.m., central time, to add AP coverage.
Related Stories
- DA in Cheney-Gonzales Case Shouts at Judge, Who Seeks Higher-Court Backup
Nov 21, 2008, 06:01 pm CST - Layoffs at Big Immigration Boutique; Fragomen Says Hiring to Be Curtailed
Nov 21, 2008, 04:43 pm CST - Kansas City, Mo., Mayor Sues After His Wife is Banned from City Hall
Nov 21, 2008, 04:24 pm CST - Deputy Calif. DA is Charged in Alleged Rape of Colleague
Nov 21, 2008, 01:15 pm CST
Related Topics
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Comments
Posted by kay sieverding - 8 months, 1 week, 2 days, 19 hours, 29 minutes ago
here are two suggestions: since review process is primarily paper/ECF, having a random assortment of panel judges from different circuits will decrease tendency of circuits to protect their local dirty laundry, provide fresh eyes, and cost very little more. 2.) Random drug tests and restrictions on alcohol consumption. If judges think other professions should have to tolerate random drug tests, then they should too because there are rumors about judges and drugs and proof of lawyers and drugs. If airline pilots can’t drink the night before, why should judges be able to? These rules would also reduce the probability of scandals re prostitutes and strip clubs since those are usually alcohol related.