Trials & Litigation

Baker & McKenzie wins damages retrial in driller's $103M malpractice case


There was good news and bad news for Baker & McKenzie in a Mississippi Supreme Court opinion issued Thursday.

The good news is that a new trial will be held on proximate cause and the $103 million in damages awarded in a legal malpractice and breach-of-contract case that contends the megafirm helped one client strip another of millions of dollars in assets. The bad news is that Baker & McKenzie remains liable.

In its 59-page opinion (PDF), the supreme court recounts a complex litigation saga involving oil and gas contractor S. Lavon Evans Jr., and his companies; Evans’ former business partner Reed Cagle and the company for which Cagle acted; and Baker & McKenzie and law firm partner Joel Held, who worked in the Dallas office.

Evans contended, and a Jones County Circuit Court jury apparently agreed, that Baker & McKenzie helped Cagle and his company gain control of Evans’ business and assets while representing both men. The law firm argued that it represented Evans on only a limited basis.

Even though he had expressly said that he must have at least a 51 percent interest and would not mortgage his free-and-clear drilling equipment, Evans alleged, the law firm helped Cagle obtain mortgages on his rig to which he had never consented.

Evans said Baker & McKenzie not only drafted loan documents without his authorization but misrepresented that Cagle owned his rig and lied to a lender, the Associated Press reports.

The article doesn’t include any comment from Baker & McKenzie, and the law firm did not immediately respond to a phone message Friday afternoon from the ABA Journal.

See also:

ABAJournal.com: “Baker & McKenzie Seeks to Overturn $103M Malpractice Verdict”

Previous:
Hospital sues to boot 'belligerent' patient from acute-care bed

Next:
Can lawyers use Groupon-type marketing? ABA ethics opinion sees problems with prepaid deals


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.