Real Estate & Property Law
Business Booming for Lawyers Who Help Homeowners Facing Foreclosure
Posted Mar 9, 2009 3:18 PM CST
By Martha Neil
There's one area of law practice that's booming right now for attorneys in many areas of the country.
With foreclosures at record levels, homeowners need help reaching a resolution with lenders. And while they may not be able to pay a lawyer much, if anything, many attorneys are either taking such cases pro bono or looking to collect from a third party if lending laws have been violated, according to the Indianapolis Star.
The first of a series of planned training sessions for lawyers in Indiana who want to enhance their skills in the practice area was packed. Attendees, who included judges and mediators as well as attorneys, were provided with information about new rules and standards under the mortgage rescue plans recently announced by the Obama administration, the article notes.
Such sessions are "desperately needed," says solo Christine Jackson of Indianapolis. About 20 struggling homeowners contact her weekly for help.
"There just aren't enough people trained," says Jackson. She usually doesn't charge the homeowner, but can often collect by settling a federal Truth in Lending Act claim over the mortgage.

Comments
B. McLeod
Mar 9, 2009 5:26 PM CST
Also in desperate need of legal services are those who have already been divested of their homes, such that their needs are now both in tents, and of growing in tent cities. (A/k/a, “Bushvilles”).
Flag this comment
oldnewlawyer
Mar 13, 2009 6:36 AM CST
Don’t forget renters whose rights are being stomped on by landlords when property goes into foreclosure. Again, not a lot of money to be made per client here, but good experience and a chance to develop relationships and visibility.
Flag this comment
T. Doucet
Mar 13, 2009 7:34 AM CST
It’s nice to see more attorneys are practicing in this area because there are great opportunities to help people, while not (always) working for free.
The last line mentions the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). This powerful law offers homeowners who refinanced within the last 3 years (3 year SoL) the ability to rescind their transaction if technical errors are present. Rescission enables the homeowner to recoup at least all interest paid on the mortgage plus most closing costs, which can amount to tens of thousands of dollars. Attorney’s fees can also be statutorily available.
As someone who wrote a book on foreclosure defense (23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure), and regularly audits loans for attorneys (I am a former mortgage firm owner and 2L), the amount of damages I see in some loans can be astounding. Recently, I completed an audit that triggered about $120,000 in rescission value for the borrower ($650,000 mortgage), plus statutory attorneys fees. About 50%+ of the refinance transactions I audit have errors enabling statutory rescission – errors that could have easily been avoided at closing.
If you are thinking about getting into foreclosure defense, but are not sure how to make a living in it, take a look at resources on TILA. There are certainly homeowners who could use your help.
Flag this comment
HT
Mar 13, 2009 7:35 AM CST
oh wow, a booming area of business where people are broke and cannot pay their bills. awesome. conversely, being a foreclosure attorney business is exploding and their is no issue with banks paying their bills.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Mar 13, 2009 7:44 AM CST
“No issue with banks paying their bills”? Must be on a distant planet.
Flag this comment
Carl E. Oates
Mar 13, 2009 7:53 AM CST
Why am I not allowed to use your email suggestion on an article.?
Flag this comment
Sid Goldstein
Mar 13, 2009 8:21 AM CST
Of any possible interest?
Flag this comment
Conan
Mar 13, 2009 8:48 AM CST
Any idea how to get into the foreclosure/bankruptcy business if you don’t have experience in the field?
Flag this comment
Diana Tsudik
Mar 13, 2009 8:57 AM CST
I’ve been approached by foreclosure companies looking to connect with an attorney. But I am wary of joining such companies because they’re so frequently shut down. I would, however, love to do this on my own, but have little foreclosure experience. What are the best resources I can references to learn?
Flag this comment
Dave Roy
Mar 13, 2009 9:59 AM CST
The National Consumer Law Center has some great resources.
Flag this comment
JME
Mar 13, 2009 10:03 AM CST
Also, accept a case. I have two foreclosure cases going now, one is probably a lost cause because the family didn’t come to me until after the Sheriff’s Sale, but there are holes in the case, so I am going to fight anyway. Surprising how much you will learn by digging into a case.
Flag this comment
JMO
Mar 13, 2009 10:46 AM CST
Go to PLI’s free 6 hour seminar on sub-prime mortgage defense. Very Good! And the presenter is from the National Consumer Law Center. Good CLE’s - applicable to all states- one special section for Cali Law
Flag this comment
Gordon
Mar 13, 2009 11:57 AM CST
I have heard of a foreclosure delay tactic being used in some parts of the country that, after a bit of research, it reminds me of how important in law (and finance) to always go back to the basics. It’s a legal delay tactic to use when a homeowner is in foreclosure. File a motion demanding the lender to produce the original note as proof the lender has a right to foreclose. When I say back to basics, the history of the mortgage industry is that most banks never sold the loans or packed loans together to be sold as investments like today. So the “current lender” who is receives the monthly mortgage payment and now foreclosing either owns a package of loans or acquired the loan as it was sold. Remember 1L property law the saying “nemo dat que non habit”? It meant one cannot give an interest in property that one does not have. In contrast, one cannot take an interest in property that one does not have a right to take.
So the tactic of demanding the current lender present the note forces the lender to trace the loan back to the original lender and obtain the note giving the current lender to right to payment of that note. This process takes time but the homeowner is entitled to it or otherwise anyone could claim a right to foreclose on a home. With so many lenders foreclosing, some don’t have time to track down the original note so foreclosure is delayed because they go after the easy ones first. Eventually the document can be produced so its no assurance the homeowner won’t get the boot. But it gives them time to maybe get current or find some alternatives for refinancing. But also, it is in the judge’s discretion to grant the homeowner’s motion.
Flag this comment
Lester
Mar 13, 2009 1:05 PM CST
I suspect the delay tactic that Gordon mentioned is being used in those parts of the country with judicial foreclosure laws where the foreclosing lender has to seek a court order to foreclose. In such cases the homeowner has the privilege of filing the motion demanding the lender to produce the original note.
Is there any tactic being used that produces a similar result in states with non-judicial foreclosure laws where the lender does not need to obtain a court order to foreclose?
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Mar 13, 2009 5:42 PM CST
Gordon, it can be much better than a delay. Some of the servicers trying to foreclose on behalf of mortgage pools have been unable to find the damned things AT ALL, despite being given time by the court to come up with them. You are right, it comes of nobody really thinking through how the underlying mortgages would be enforced when they set up these securitizations.
Flag this comment
Kalifornia arnold
Mar 13, 2009 8:38 PM CST
Attorneys who specialize in real estate law shouldn’t complicate things—in fact, they should keep their fee simple.
Flag this comment
Marion L. Bell
Mar 13, 2009 11:38 PM CST
How do I find a good lawyer that I can trust? I have been trying to modify my loan since OCt. But because it ia not my primary home, my lender will not budge. My lesser has been laid off. He’s moving out. I have paid 9 mos. on this loan before it was rented, that is , so far. If I could just lower it, it will be easier to rent, but so far no help from my lender. I am not interested in a short sell because we have put too much in the house. Several firms called me, but because of the numerous scamers, I don’t know where to turn. I can’t trust anyone.
Flag this comment
Don O'Donniley
Mar 14, 2009 2:06 PM CST
Comment #14 refers to a Deed of Trust state such as TN where the conveyance at the time of the Note is to a Trustee who can without judicial hearing execute a deed at aafter a Trustee’ s sale following default on the note. I too am interested in delay and defense tactics for this type action.
Flag this comment
Atiya
Mar 16, 2009 11:32 AM CST
For those who are interested in gaining experience in foreclosure defense, I suggest contacting your local Legal Aid office. I know that we have offered free training. You take a case or two pro bono; we provide malpractice insurance for our cases, and you gain valuable experience.
Flag this comment
David Rowthorn
Mar 17, 2009 6:16 PM CST
Not long ago, most people had the wisdom to consult with their trusted personal lawyer before they made major legal and financial decisions. If this were still true and if people had paid a nominal retainer and sought legal advice BEFORE they signed the loan documents, there either would not be any mortgage crisis at all or it would be much smaller. The entire population has forgotten that the real value of a lawyer is in paying a very small amount to avoid the problem and not pay a whole lot more later to try to fix the problem. Not only did most people fail to get legal advice before they made the original mistake, they now fail to get legal advice even when a foreclosure, which is a complex civil lawsuit, is filed. As a result, now consumers get taken advantage of again by the rescue scammers or they let the foreclosure proceed to a default judgment. This problem is far too complex to go it alone. If you think you cannot afford a lawyer, ask yourself if you can afford to get scammed again or lose your home. The generalized distaste for lawyers causes people to stay away from good advice and good help. Penny wise and pound foolish is the order of the day. In my view, it is far better to have someone on your side of the bargaining table. By the way, the internet is a poor substitute for good legal advice from your trusted personal lawyer. It is always better to avoid a problem than solve a problem.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.