First Amendment
Judges Barring Loaded Words in Criminal Cases
Posted Jun 16, 2008 5:58 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Judges in criminal trials are barring loaded words, ranging from “rape” to “crime scene.”
Joshua Marquis, vice president of the National District Attorneys Association, told the National Law Journal he’s gotten “a flood” of e-mails telling him of judges’ decisions to bar certain words. Banned terms include "homicide," "drunk," "victim," "murderer," "killer" and "crime scene."
Marquis calls the trend absurd and dangerous, but defense lawyers say banning such words can help maintain the presumption of innocence.
Jack King, spokesman for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, says the right to due process trumps First Amendment concerns in these cases.
One lawyer who agrees is Daniel Monnat of Wichita, Kan. He was able to get the words "victim" and "crime scene" banned in a pending homicide case. “You don't want the witnesses and officers of law enforcement talking as if it was a foregone conclusion, almost drumming it into the jurors' minds that a crime was committed by virtue of the fact that there is a victim," he told the National Law Journal.
Wendy Murphy of the New England School of Law represents a Nebraska woman who challenged a judge who banned her from using the word "rape" in the trial of her alleged attacker. The woman has lost her appeals; Murphy is seeking certiorari.

Comments
Scholarly Foot
Jun 16, 2008 8:30 AM CST
While I can see the validity of prohibiting the words of murderer and killer, “crime scene” and “drunk” seem a stretch.
Flag this comment
Mark
Jun 23, 2008 9:29 PM CST
crime scene - implies a crime has been committed. While in a murder investigation a crime scene is a no brainer, but with rape ‘crime scene’ implies something illegal took place and if the defendend is trying to suggest it was consensual then saying a ‘crime scene’ is implying that there definitely was a crime committed.
People have an inherit trust of police officers but the police are not always right. I think this is definitely a step in the right direction with being neutral as possible in the court of law.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.