Careers
These Lawyers Found New Careers More Gratifying than Law Practice
Posted Sep 9, 2009 8:04 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Two lawyers who gave up law practice tell a legal publication that their new careers are more gratifying or exciting than legal work. Others see their jobs as a better fit for their personality or a natural progression from their legal past.
The Maryland Daily Record profiled six lawyers who moved into other fields. They have new careers as a: law librarian, certified financial planner, public-interest group founder, travel consultant, law firm recruiting and diversity director, and founder of a business that connects startups with lenders.
Nonpracticing lawyers tend to fit into two categories, according to the story. Either they found that law practice wasn’t what they had envisioned, or they went to law school because they couldn’t think of anything else to do.
The law librarian, Janet Sinder, told the publication she didn’t enjoy her job as a criminal appeals defense lawyer as much as she thought she would. So she got a master’s in library science and now works at the library at the University of Maryland School of Law.
"When you’re a criminal defense attorney, you don’t win a lot of your cases on appeal, but you get so much positive feedback in the library world when you help them find something."
Randi Lewis tells the publication that law practice was too adversarial. Her job as director of diversity and professional development at Miles & Stockbridge is never boring, she said. "This is such a great fit for my personality and my intellect, too."
Hat tip to Legal Blog Watch.

Comments
Oh dear
Sep 9, 2009 8:20 AM CST
More “diversity directors”....just what we need!
Flag this comment
George Patsourakos
Sep 9, 2009 10:16 AM CST
Some lawyers do not find practicing law a satisfying career. In fact, they find it frustrating dealing with divorces, child support, home foreclosures, etc.
That said, these lawyers will work in other professions—professions in which a law degree is usually helpful—and they will find these jobs more interesting than practicing law.
Flag this comment
mac
Sep 9, 2009 10:21 AM CST
Unfortunately many people can’t go into these “alternative” careers because they can’t make enough in these fields to pay back their law school loans. And getting another degree to get into another field is not an option if you’re already saddled with too much debt.
Flag this comment
alan
Sep 9, 2009 12:44 PM CST
most lawyers who “go into another field” do so because they cannot pay rent on what they earn as a lawyer. No surprise there, seeing as how the over-supply of lawyers is so large due to the misleading income figures used by law schools to lure new victims.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Sep 9, 2009 10:49 PM CST
When they have enough debt, they’ll get the third degree.
Flag this comment
Never Looked Back
Sep 10, 2009 6:51 AM CST
I left law 10 years ago to go into HR. Yep, I had to take classes which cost $. The upside: 9 to 5, exceptional benefits, a sweet compensation package, and time for family. I never looked back.
Flag this comment
Fred
Sep 11, 2009 5:39 AM CST
I can’t believe this. I mean, what could possibly be more gratifying, exciting and satisfying than legal work?
</sarcasrm>
Flag this comment
Confused
Sep 11, 2009 6:14 AM CST
How does someone who didn’t like being an attorney to begin with justify recruiting new attorneys?
Flag this comment
AWG
Sep 11, 2009 6:57 AM CST
I spent 16 years in private practice litigating business and L&E disputes. I enjoyed the work very much and I was fortunate to practice with some terrific colleagues. However, I reached a point where I had done all of the things I wanted to do in the law and desired a change of pace. I’m now Dean of Students at a highly selective public university (my alma mater) and I couldn’t be happier. Obviously, I had several years of good income to pay off my student loans and thus the sizeable pay cut didn’t feel as painful as it might otherwise. I have also found life in a small college town to be very enjoyable, after many years in the big city. I guess my point is that I didn’t hate the law or private legal practice; I just reached a point where I wanted to do something different. I will say that I work the same long hours in my current job as I did in the law, but I drive home every night feeling like I made a difference. I confess that wasn’t always the case while I was in private practice.
Flag this comment
HR Curious
Sep 11, 2009 7:09 AM CST
Never Looked Back - I am considering my options to go into HR for private industry. Did you get an MBA with an HR concentration, or what classes did you take? Just curious because I’m trying to find the best course of action to transition away from private law practice and into business. Thanks.
Flag this comment
Steve Perkins
Sep 11, 2009 7:23 AM CST
I’m with Comment #8. Let me get this straight… you’re a “Director of Professional Development” at a law firm, and your own development path was getting the hell out of the profession in disgust? What do you say to people, and can you say it with a straight face?
The job being “a great fit for her intellect” got a chuckle out me, too. I suspect she’s right.
Flag this comment
Cecilia Mowatt
Sep 11, 2009 8:07 AM CST
I am disappointed in the assumption that the decision to do something that is not traditional legal practice means you are either of inferior intellect or running away from the stereotypical pressures of practice. My own career path has been nontraditional after an early stint with the SEC. Yet I proudly put “Attorney” as my profession/occupation. There has rarely been a day throughout my professional life where I did not need to review a contract, policy or legislation for its legal ramifications for the businesses I serve. Legal training is the best education for long term ROI. IRAC is a great foundation for being able to tackle any problem. We lawyers can rule where diversity is concerned because when we do our jobs right we consider all perspectives.
Flag this comment
Donald
Sep 11, 2009 8:11 AM CST
As long as she’s happy with what she’s doing, and her firm thinks she’s qualified and performing satisfactorily, who cares what her position title is or why she left the law? Plus, I didn’t see where she left the law in disgust, or how she is recruiting new attorneys. Maybe I need to pay closer attention to the article. Or maybe other people do.
Flag this comment
2L
Sep 11, 2009 8:14 AM CST
I haven’t even finished law school and I am already considered an alternative career. I really am wasting my time and money
Flag this comment
Hadley V. Baxendale (HVB)
Sep 11, 2009 8:22 AM CST
I am a third generation lawyer. My father told me that law is not a job you can tolerate for 40 years and then retire, or as the saying goes, “the law is a cruel mistress—but you have to love the law.” I’m still at it 25 years later and I agree with him.
The “law degree is helpful in other jobs” used to be true when getting a degree was inexpensive, and if you were in your twenties, childless, and didn’t mind three more years of austere living. A great track 25 years ago was college/law school/ practice 3 years/go to the family business. Sadly, that “helpful” factor doesn’t make economic sense today. I tell students not to go to law school unless they truly want to be a lawyer.
There have always been lawyers who found they didn’t like the practice. The problem today is that those people are trapped, economically, and therefore frustrated and bitter.
Flag this comment
Steve Perkins
Sep 11, 2009 8:32 AM CST
Comment #12: Don’t get me wrong, I’m not being an elitist. Much like Comment #14, I’m not even sure if I’ll practice after graduation or stay in my current field where the money and hours are decent and the jobs are plentiful.
However, it’s a bit ridiculous to find someone lucky enough to be doing appellate work (!), see that they became a “diversity coordinator” instead, and then hear them say that it’s an intellectual STEP UP from being an attorney.
Umm, no… it’s not. If you were doing low-level doc review or depositions or something, then maybe. But moving from appellate work to a fluffy pseudo-H.R. job does not put you in an intellectual position to look down on your old profession. Just admit the burnout and move on with your life.
Flag this comment
Sara
Sep 11, 2009 8:40 AM CST
Steve, you have no idea what you are talking about. You have never practiced law. Some of it is interesting, much of it can be rote and mind numbing depending on the job. I work in HR and it can be fascinating and challenging. I develop policies in light of legal, policy, and business concerns. I negotiate contracts and resolve disputes. I deal with a variety of people and issues every single day (rare in many practice areas). And I have an amazing quality of life, and make MORE than I did as a lawyer. I wasn’t burnt out, I made a calm assessment that there was a better way to live. I do legal work on the side still for projects, friends and family, and still like being a lawyer. So many practicing attorneys are always unhappy and stressed out- you will learn this. I encourage you to listen to others and not make judgments about things you have never done.
Flag this comment
Sara
Sep 11, 2009 8:43 AM CST
Steve, by the way, I did constitutional civil rights due process class actions, wrote legislation, worked on trials and appeals, etc.- which are interesting and complicated areas of law. I found that I tired of always looking backwards to fix others’ messes and not being the decision-maker but rather being a service person implementing others’ ideas. That is the nature of lawyers- where in my HR role I have much more sway over what happens in shaping the future- something I found was more satisfying for me. Just food for thought.
Flag this comment
Cheryl
Sep 11, 2009 8:46 AM CST
Comment #16
Actually, the appellate lawyer left her field to become a law librarian, not a “fluffy-pseudo-H.R.” position. Perhaps attention to details would be better served without rancour.
I’m sure, as a current student, you yourself found the services of the law librarian to be more than helpful on an occasion or two.
The bottom line with the law profession, much like any other “public service” professions,- love it or leave it, there’s rarely a half measure.
Flag this comment
Steve Perkins
Sep 11, 2009 8:47 AM CST
I’m not sure if “Sara” and “Randi Lewis” from the article above are the same person, or if Sara is simply someone who identifies with Randi. Either way, Comment #17 is perfectly reasonable and respectable. From what I saw over my Summer internship, I gather that the grass might not be greener… most of the lawyers there made less than people in my current field, and work often was no more interesting. Regardless, telling a bunch of lawyers and law students that another field is a better “fit for your intellect” is an ideal way to draw groans and chuckles.
Flag this comment
Sara
Sep 11, 2009 8:49 AM CST
Steve- one more comment- don’t assume HR work is fluffy. Some is, some isn’t. My assignment includes negotiating over $150 million dollars in union deals per year; working on budget crisis, emergency operations, transit, environmental, etc. the whole range of government issues in a major U.S. city. It is far more serious and less petty than many legal disputes- I am never bored and feel far more useful than I did in a lot of litigation settings. I got the job because I had labor law experience- regular fluffy types would not be qualified to do it and there’s a whole world of lawyer-HR practtiioners out there doing this kind of work. We all joke about hoping the economy doesn’t get so bad that we’d be forced to practice law again because we are so much happier.
Flag this comment
Margaret
Sep 11, 2009 8:50 AM CST
I’ve been practicing law for 12 years - after a 20-year career interacting with the public - and I am totally burnt out. The nastiness and pettiness of opposing counsel has drained me (where others might find it invigorating). The HR career and diversity coordinator careers sound so much more civil, with positive interaction. It’s encouraging to hear others have found good alternate use for that expensive education.
And for that 2L (comment 14) - GET OUT WHILE YOU CAN!!!!
Flag this comment
Associate Zero
Sep 11, 2009 8:51 AM CST
I’ve always envied law librarians - less stress and they get to leave at 5. Work is nothing but a paycheck anyway - your passion and reasons for existing are not your day job. So why kill yourself in stress and misery, working with a-holes, for the paycheck when you could kill yourself less (or more slowly) and then have more time in life to do things that are meaningful? Yes - I’m just enduring law. Can’t imagine how anyone could feel more than tolerance (love? what’s wrong with you?).
Flag this comment
HVB
Sep 11, 2009 8:51 AM CST
Good point Sara: most law practice is “always looking backwards to fix others’ messes”. At one point it aggravated me until I looked at it from another perspective: I am solving people’s problems, and that is challenging and rewarding (especially if you are fortunate enough to have appreciative clients; if not, get out!)
I often say, “if everyone did what they were supposed to, I wouldn’t have a job!”
Others assessing this profession should consider that some areas are inherently at the front-end of decision making, such as transactional and estate planning work.
Flag this comment
Sara
Sep 11, 2009 8:53 AM CST
Steve, thanks for the reply, I assure you I’m not Randy (I’m glad she likes her job but I’d never be a diversity coordinator…), just someone who went through this transition over a few years’ time of consideration and happy to share about it. It is hard to leave practice when you’ve invested so much time/money into the field- but once I left I realized that doesn’t matter- you still use it, employers value it, etc. Cheers, must get to work.
Flag this comment
Attorney one year so far
Sep 11, 2009 9:08 AM CST
I have been an attorney one year and find my profession/job very rewarding but agree with comment #15 -
“The “law degree is helpful in other jobs” used to be true when getting a degree was inexpensive, and if you were in your twenties, childless, and didn’t mind three more years of austere living. ... I tell students not to go to law school unless they truly want to be a lawyer.”
I believe we as attorneys should be more honest with potential law students about the price they pay to become an attorney and if they do want to do it, they really need to want to do it and not just because they can’t figure out what to do with their life. Law schools are in the business of churning out new lawyers regardless of the end result, the majority of the loans will take many years to pay off with the salaries that exist for the majority of the law jobs out there, if they can find jobs.
Flag this comment
So True
Sep 11, 2009 9:31 AM CST
“There have always been lawyers who found they didn’t like the practice. The problem today is that those people are trapped, economically, and therefore frustrated and bitter.”
This is so true. I’ve been out of law school for all of 1.5 years, but looking at the people who graduated 1-2 years ahead of me, with me and just in this last year I’m already seeing so many of my friends who truly hate what they do, would be much better suited, temperamentally, to something else, but can’t due to $100-$200,000 in student loans. They become very bitter, disillusioned and jaded very very fast. I shudder to think even just 5 years down the road.
Flag this comment
Esq.
Sep 11, 2009 9:59 AM CST
You can’t really paint “practising the law” with such narrow strokes. Being a trial lawyer, big firm transactional lawyer, government lawyer, administrative law judge, document reviewer, legal aid attorney, etc. are all very different in terms of workload, environment, and individual personalities and skill sets. I’m starting to think that a lot of people leave the law because there is a derth of career counsling for lawyers. Or, more specifically, they are shuttled either into big firms or certain types of trial work by their law schools, and aren’t aware that there are many other career paths for practising attorneys.
I’m about six years out myself. I definitely feel that the law is my calling, and greatly enjoy research, writing, and problem solving. And while the gold-standard of the profession seems to be membership in the big firm rat-race, clerking in the federal courts, or in the political arena that is big-name agency prosecution, I don’t believe that I would find any of those pursuits rewarding.
Flag this comment
Casey
Sep 11, 2009 10:33 AM CST
What’s a diversity director!? I’ve never heard that phrase before. I’m just a third year and haven’t had much experience outside of clerking for a small firm and we have nothing like that… Does anyone know?
Flag this comment
DR
Sep 11, 2009 10:40 AM CST
I concur with #28 above. I believe that satisfaction with the practice of law (at least for me) revolves around the type of practice and the environment in which you practice. I find what I do right now to be very challenging on many levels, but I would find it hard to enjoy some other practice areas, especially one in which I would have to be a generalist.
I did the reverse of this article…I became an attorney at 40 years of age after working in another field for almost 20 years. My only regret is that sometimes I wish I could be more well-rounded. Practicing law, as well as handling family responsibilities, leaves little time for other interests. I would still like to engage more time in my past interests…which was the arts. I feel very lucky, though, to be where I am at this stage in my life. I think it is great when people find some satisfaction in their work, even if they have to switch careers.
Flag this comment
mak70
Sep 11, 2009 10:45 AM CST
I just graduated law school in May and am waiting for bar results. I am hopeful that I passed and that I am able to find that a new career is more gratifying than law practice, but I may not get the chance to be a lawyer in the first place. I was not in the top of my class at a less than prestigious school so I am may or may not be able to get a job as an attorney. People must learn to believe in themself and not use excuses to feel sorry for themselves- if you don’t find what you’re looking for, keep looking. Regardless, the law school experience might have been a great experience, ask me in five years and I’ll let you know.
Flag this comment
JME
Sep 11, 2009 11:28 AM CST
#31 - I graduated in 2008. #80 of 86. That’s kinda the bottom of the class. I graduated at age 54. I attended a state univeristy in the midwest. I knew no law firm was going to interview me, long before I got started. I made up my mind from the beginning, that I would go solo. I found a small town with no lawyers, set up shop with no money, and my first year of practice in nearly up. I am not in debt so far as the practice is concerned, although I am not making much money to take home. I do have strong family support, as I was told my family would never allow me to be homeless, so my mortgage and basic needs are met. The firm pays for itself, and is beginning to show a profit. My best case was given to me by one of my professors. If you want to practice law, there are ways to do it. Look around, find a lawyer in solo practice considering retirement. maybe you can get in as an office share, then assume the practice when he retires. Believe me, it happens. It happened to one of my classmates - wish I’d done it, his office is five blocks from my house, I commute 30 miles. Point is, don’t rely on someone else, make it happen for you. And I KNEW, walking out of the bar exam, that I had passed. I’ve deferred my student loans out, to give me time to get established, but even so, law school only cost me about $90K.
Flag this comment
Ray
Sep 11, 2009 3:24 PM CST
I have always said there are two things you can do with a Law degree; practice law or something else. I believe the article (and the ABA) misses a substantial group of people who attend law school with no intention of ever practicing law. The law degree is an adjunct to what they already do. I got my degree so I could be a better project manager on mega-construction projects and have found it invaluable. I had a number of friends in law school who got thier degree for very similar reasons from a PhD research biologist concerned about legal research issues to an assistant HR director of a major corporation to a union business agent who wanted to advise union members better on work and injury issues.
Flag this comment
JN
Sep 11, 2009 3:33 PM CST
I have noted many comments posted (and not just in this thread) regarding “too many lawyers” being graduated for the available work and the high cost of a legal education (generally couched in terms of “too much debt”). In a capitalist economy, it would seem that this should be a self-correcting problem, although I realize that some individuals can get badly hurt in the process. Unless the story can be kept hidden (no way in today’s connected world!), it would seem that before long, supply and demand should lead to a balance.
As for me, I graduated law school at 39, have now practiced for 18 years (12 as a solo) and love it. (Strangely enough, I loved law school too.) I have attorney friends still practicing in their 70’s and 80’s who have no plans to quit, and it is not because they need the money. Obviously, no one thing is right for everyone, but I do get tired of reading how terrible the practice of law is. If you don’t like it, find something else to do, but don’t assume that because it is not right for you, it is not great for others.
Flag this comment
Removed
Sep 11, 2009 9:40 PM CST
Comment removed by moderator.
Flag this comment
WZ
Sep 12, 2009 2:23 AM CST
I started law school in my 40s, and enjoyed it immensely! - passed the bar on first try, practiced solo for about ten years, did okay for the most part, but the stress was unbearable. Moreover, I was never able to pay back law school loans. At least I made enough for rent and to raise my kids. Eventually I decided to go back to what I was doing before, being a professional musician, and within four years had paid back every cent of my loans. I love what I do now, every day. It’s still not big bucks, but I sleep well and no longer suffer from stress of court deadlines, brief writing and discovery hassles, and having to deal with rude and inconsiderate counsel, the kind of people I wouldn’t want to meet in a dark alley let alone sit across from in a deposition!
I loved law school, and did enjoy the practice on the whole. I still regard my legal education as an enormous asset that I continue to put to use frequently. I’m glad to see that so many others are truly enjoying and prospering in their careers in law. But I feel I’m back in my own skin now.
Flag this comment
my56thchoice
Sep 13, 2009 2:20 AM CST
#15, how the hell can people say “don’t go to law school unless you really want to be a lawyer” when you generally have no idea what it is like to be a lawyer until you become one!
Yes it’s true that many people are “trapped” in careers they must stay in to pay their bills but in fact most people are trapped this way no matter what they do for a living if they are honest about this with themselves.
True enough, there are many paths to successfully practicing law as #28 points out, but finding a career you can thrive in and not merely endure is difficult. If we are working we are glad we have work at all and are often despair of being happy in our jobs. Sometimes it is not the work itself but the need to do it 95 percent of our waking hours that is the cause of immense frustration.
Some might say “grow up, this is the way it is and get used to it” but it would be nice to be able to practice law without becoming a total slave to a job or a law practice.
There are also those who say “find something to do for a living that you enjoy” but those people are not paying my bills. Losing 50 percent of my income to do someting I enjoy more seems like a poor solution. I would happily make a little less money to work shorter hours though.
Of course employers always want employees who are “flexible”. Maybe part of the solution is to convince some employers that they too would benefit from being more flexable when it comes to work hours. If it is OK for them to replace full time associates with part time per diem attorneys or unpaid law school interns, why is it so wrong for any associate to want to work a few less hours for a little less pay?
Once baseball teams expected starting pitchers to go nine innings but today teams rarely expect them to pitch more than six. Teams now carry 12 or 13 pitchers instead of the 10 they carried 30 years ago.
Of course this change only represents trading one baseball religion for another but it is something that would once have been considered out of the question by baseball teams. The fact is though that having more pitchers and having them generally pitch fewer innings has hurt neither the teams nor the pitchers.
Perhaps this idea is something the legal profession can benefit from as well. It just may be that having a few more attorneys working a few less hours a week would be better for everyone. The work might all still get done and everyone might still make decent money but there would also be more time for living and not just for working in the office, commuting, getting CLE credits, eating, sleeping, taking some Sundays off and going on vacation once a year.
Of course very small firms might not have this option but it seems like an idea that might work well for many firms and the people who work for them.
I hear that some firms actually permit flexible work hours in exchange for less pay to some extent but many firms that could be more flexible still insist on all associates working long hours (except when it is the employer’s option to cut back on hours).
Flag this comment
steve sedberry
Sep 13, 2009 5:55 AM CST
A law degree will always provide graduates with a variety of career options, unlike most other post-graduate degrees. This is because the intellectual rigor associated with the educational disciplne provide a skillset with applications in a variety of fields, including management, journalism, business, strategy, planning, teaching and others.
Lawyers have gone on to a variety of other careers, perhaps because they had to, but more likely simply because they could.
John Grisham, Howard Cosell, Ghandi, Mandela, John Cleese, Ben Stein, Earle Stanley Gardner, Geraldo Rivera, Scott Turow, and numerous other lawyers have had successful careers after law practice. It would be pretty difficult to come up with another educational discipline with graduates in fields as diverse as these.
For more discussion on career options with a law degree, see www.lawschoollabyrinth.com.
Flag this comment
Steve
Sep 13, 2009 10:26 AM CST
To #38
There is s difference between bright hard-working people with law degrees going into other careers and people being able to use the law degree to facilitate the transition.
A J.D. is not the “door opener” that it is made out to be. More often than not, the J.D. has to be hidden from prospective employers if one is attempting to leave (or bypass) a legal career.
The most successful are those who saved some money and then went to work for themselves.
Flag this comment
Door closer
Sep 13, 2009 10:41 AM CST
Employers are understnadaby wary of people who invested all that time and money in getting a legal education but don’t want to be a lawyer.
What does that tell a potential employer??
That you don’t know what yout want to do, lacking focus, bad judgment etc…..
A JD is not a door openeer to other things, it is a door closer.
Flag this comment
Legal Case
Sep 14, 2009 7:38 AM CST
Suing people for 40% of the proceeds—-what could be more rewarding???
Flag this comment
cgb
Sep 14, 2009 9:16 AM CST
I was in private practice for 20+ years and gave it up for the public sector. The stress of small firm and/or solo practice drove me nuts. Not to mention disrespectful and ungrateful clients who despite wins on their behalf refused to pay their bills. But for clients, tjhe practice of law would be fun. Now its a regular paycheck, 9-5, insurance paid, etc., etc. and no more dipping into the credit lines. Ah, freedom!
Flag this comment
b
Sep 14, 2009 11:18 AM CST
In my experience, the J.D. has definitely opened doors. I have switched careers twice since graduating. Both times, my degree appeared to make up for my lack of experience in the new field. Switching careers has been a great adventure for me because it has allowed me to keep learning and growing and to avoid intellectual stagnation. I have not found that people were “wary” of the money and time I committed to the degree; to the contrary, they probably overestimated my intelligence and ability based solely on the degree. The key to switching careers with a J.D. is to carefully form your arguments ahead of time as to why your past skills are important for the position you are applying for. This is one thing that we lawyers are very good at! Don’t be afraid! Make the switch if you need to! Don’t listen to all the naysayers! In my experience, the law is full of people telling you things are impossible or can’t be done.
Flag this comment
Doug Smith
Sep 14, 2009 1:37 PM CST
I have always read and never, replied.
I have severe dyslexia and don’t read or write.
I’ve built a computer that I talked to and it talks to me. There are lawyers who love with they do and without them this world would be a mass.
I have taught at the local university and found it rewarding but not financially.
Started a company and made more money than I ever thought I would in my wildest dreams. But was so unhappy I cried out to God. Sold the company and was going to cruise the world on my boat and ended up taking care of some kids by accident.
Last 25 years I have made nothing. But I have found joy beyond belief. The movie Safe Harbor was made about my life. I used to care about what people thought of me. But I have learned it doesn’t matter.
I tell my boys it’s bad enough you have to work for a living. you might as well enjoy it.
The movie caused people to believe that we made lots of money on it. And so a lot of our donors quit giving. Then the economy slowed things down. I’ve had to lay off my entire staff. I’ve kept school teachers and pay the mortgage out of my retirement. My friends or always saying how awful this is. But there’s still a joy and peace that I cannot explain since I had no salary to start with I lost nothing personally and as far as my retirement a cant think of anything else I want to invest in.
I spent most of my fortune fighting the state for the right to work for free. The remainder to kids who could not afford to come here.
When I was a child I lived under a bridge and had nothing but was happy.
The point being anything worth doing will be difficult.
And education is never wasted.
Money can only make you comfortable it can not bring you joy or happiness.
If you want to be a lawyer be a lawyer if you were chasing money good luck.
Flag this comment
Esq.
Sep 14, 2009 2:29 PM CST
@ #29: “What’s a diversity director!?”
It’s something found primarily in large corporations with lots of discretionary income.
Flag this comment
Esq.
Sep 14, 2009 2:45 PM CST
@ #37: I like your baseball analogy about changed expectations for pitchers being beneficial for the game and players alike.
The American League now has designated hitters,(and by extension designated pitchers). It essentially means that certain players with an extreme gift for pitching but (some of whom) can’t hit worth a damn, can not only participate in the game, but are some of the highest paid and most valued players in the game.
It’s a shame how many on the hiring end of the legal field, who supposedly seek the ‘best and the brightest’, use extremily narrow standards of evaluating candidates.
Flag this comment
Steve
Sep 14, 2009 4:42 PM CST
#43, congratulations on successful switching.
Pre-formed arguments can’t counteract a hiring manager who tosses your resume as “overqualified” with no chance at an interview.
Your best bet would be to switch careers during a tight labor market, or via interviews arranged through personal contacts.
Not to say someone who wants to switch should give up, but they must be aware that these days, a resume with a J.D. on it sent for a non-legal job isn’t going to get the warm welcome we’d like it to receive.
Flag this comment
Stephen
Sep 14, 2009 5:39 PM CST
I’m slightly disappointed by the negativity being displayed by my namesakes in these comments. Of course a law degree isn’t an automatic route to big money, easy work/life balance and a life you’ll love, nothing is. Surely somewhere in your law school careers you must have picked up the idea of not generalising and looking for fine distinctions? I certainly did. I’m also seeing a lot of self confident assertion and little evidence and that’s possibly part of the problem too.
A law degree is a very potent postgraduate qualification. It won’t open doors on its own, but neither does any degree. I’m sure some people will look at it and say “why isn’t he a lawyer?” but I’m sure there’s someone in the world who looks at people who did English in high school and says “why aren’t you a writer?” People have different mental processes and standards. Don’t tar everyone with the same brush.
Frankly I consider that things I don’t have on my CV to be more damaging to my job chances than the qualification I do have. Someone might read a law graduate’s CV and think “overqualified”, they equally might not.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.