• Home
  • News
  • ABA Finances: So Far, So Good—and No Dues Increase #ABAChicago

Annual Meeting 2009

ABA Finances: So Far, So Good—and No Dues Increase #ABAChicago

Posted Aug 6, 2009 10:14 AM CST
By James Podgers

All things considered, the ABA is moving into its new budget year on a solid footing.

Not all of the financial news for the ABA is good, Alice E. Richmond cautioned in her report to the House of Delegates on Tuesday, the closing day of the 2009 ABA Annual Meeting in Chicago. She has the daunting task of serving as ABA treasurer at a time when much of the legal profession is being pounded by the recession.

But even the bad news isn’t quite as grim as it might be, said Richmond, principal at Alice E. Richmond & Associates in Boston. For the fiscal 2009 ABA year ending Aug. 31, revenue from dues and other sources is down, but not by as much as originally projected. And the association will be able to keep expenses more than $12 million under budget for the year.

As a result, said Richmond, the fiscal 2009 budget, which totaled just under $114.5 million, will finish the year with a modest surplus of between $3.2 million and $3.5 million. “And for those of you unfamiliar with not-for-profit speak, a surplus is like a profit,” she noted. The surplus funds will go into the ABA dues warehouse, a fund that helps to offset dues increases.

“These are not economic times for the fainthearted, and there are, and will continue to be, many challenges for both the ABA leadership and the professional staff,” said Richmond in a written report that accompanied her presentation to the House. “But we will finish this fiscal year in better shape than we might have expected given the economic conditions around us.”

There appears to be reason for at least cautious optimism about the ABA’s budget for fiscal 2010, as well.

Richmond reported to the House that the Board of Governors had approved a balanced general revenue budget of $107.4 million for fiscal 2010, which starts Sept. 1. Accomplishing that will require most ABA entities to absorb 10 percent reductions in their operating budgets and some $6 million to come out of the dues warehouse. (The amount in the warehouse should reach at least $19.1 million by the time the books are closed on fiscal 2009.)

“The best news of all,” said Richmond, is that there will be no dues increase for any membership category in fiscal 2010.

But the ABA’s current stable budget picture is no reason to be complacent, Richmond cautioned in her written report to the House.

“We cannot and should not assume that, when and if the market recovers and the economy begins to show signs of improvement, we can return to the ways things were always done,” Richmond’s report states. “The upheaval caused by the economic turmoil of the past year may encourage us to think differently about how we finance the important work we do both for our members and for the public. However, one thing is certain: To do nothing is to insure that we are neither ready nor able to prosper in whatever new economic order comes from the current disarray.”

More on the Annual Meeting '09 here:

Why is #ABAChicago in our Annual Meeting headlines? Check out our hashtags post: "ABA Annual Meeting 2009 on Twitter"

ABA Journal's Annual Meeting coverage at this link.

Flickr Slideshow: ABA Journal snapshots from Annual Meeting.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Aug 6, 2009 1:16 PM CST

“The upheaval caused by the economic turmoil of the past year may encourage us to think differently about how we finance the important work we do both for our members and for the public.”  For example, the Association could actually stick to that work, instead of running off in pursuit of random social causes unrelated to issues of the legal profession.

Flag this comment

2.

tttony
Aug 6, 2009 4:57 PM CST

I would think that the ABA would be rolling in dough,  seeing as how the ABA is so obliging and accommodating when it comes to covering up for the law schools with respect to the fake salary statistics and in providing support for BigLaw firms in helping them to move their low level legal work overseas where foreign lawyers can do it.

After all, it wold seem that the law schools and the Big Law firms would have made very generous “donations” to the ABA for taking care of business for the law schools and the BigLaw firms.

Flag this comment

3.

James
Aug 6, 2009 9:41 PM CST

I canceled my membership to this slimy worthless organization the minute the price went above “free.” 

Here’s an idea.  STOP ACCREDITING LAW SCHOOLS.  We don’t need any more T3/T4 diploma mills.  Even the new Irvine school is shaping up to be a joke.  Mandatory International Law classes?  Are you kidding me?  What California really needs right now is another UC Lawschool.

Flag this comment

4.

B. McLeod
Aug 8, 2009 8:16 PM CST

It has been quite a number of years now, since the ABA felt it necessary to weigh in with a political position on abortion.  At least in the region where I practice, quite a number of lawyers dropped their ABA memberships over that, and have never been back.  I retained my membership at the time, with some few colleagues I know of, simply because I considered it important to continue to support the main national organization that (ostensibly, at least) supports this profession.  Still, I thought it was a grave error for the ABA to go off on these tangents, and I have not changed my opinion in that regard.  The ABA should address issues that are core issues for the legal profession, and individual members should go save the whales, or whatever, on their own, personal nickel.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.