Military Law

Abu Ghraib Prosecution Falters


Several prosecution witnesses gave testimony favoring the defense during the court-martial this week of an Army officer accused of abuses at Abu Ghraib prison.

“The more prosecutors and prosecution witnesses speak in the trial of Army Lt. Col. Steven Jordan at Fort Meade this week, the better Jordan’s defense looks,” writes Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank.

One prosecution witness testified that, to his knowledge, Jordan had nothing to do with abusive interrogations. Another said Jordan “had nothing to do with those detainees being abused.”

Milbank writes that a higher-ranking officer who admitted to approving the use of dogs in interrogations received only a reprimand and a fine.

Previous:
Ex-Exec’s Wal-Mart Suit Tossed

Next:
Maid’s Suit Can Raise Model’s Past


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.