• Home
  • News
  • Kagan’s opinions show mastery of the topic sentence and the ‘stylish dig’

U.S. Supreme Court

Kagan’s opinions show mastery of the topic sentence and the ‘stylish dig’

Posted Jul 1, 2013 10:29 AM CDT
By Debra Cassens Weiss

  • Print
  • Reprints
  • Share

Justice Elena Kagan is pushing back at conservative bravado with well-written opinions that appeal to nonlawyers, according to a newspaper editorial writer.

The New York Times highlights some of Kagan’s best turns of phrase in an article by editorial board member Lincoln Caplan.

Kagan “is a master of the topic sentence (‘A trip back in time begins to show why’) and the stylish dig (‘wrong, wrong, and wrong again’),” Caplan writes. “Yet what puts her in a class by herself is her combination of down-to-earth writing and the ingredients essential to influential opinions: conceptual insight, penetrating legal analysis and argumentative verve.”

Caplan also has these highlights from Kagan opinions:

• “The court today resolves an imaginary question, based on a mistake the courts below made about this case and others like it. … Feel free to relegate the majority’s decision to the furthest reaches of your mind: The situation it addresses should never again rise.” (From a dissent to a court decision that kept the plaintiff out of court in a labor dispute)

• “To a hammer, everything looks like a nail. And to a court bent on diminishing the usefulness of Rule 23 [governing class actions] everything looks like a class action, ready to be dismantled.” (From a dissent to an opinion enforcing contract agreements that require arbitration and prohibit class-action claims)


Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.