• Home
  • News
  • Law Firm Model Shifts from Pyramid to Diamond or Possibly a Pear

Associates

Law Firm Model Shifts from Pyramid to Diamond or Possibly a Pear

Posted May 12, 2009 7:22 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

The classic law firm staffing model is a pyramid shape, with lots of associates on the bottom and fewer partners on top.

But the recession has upended the model, so that it now appears to be more of a diamond, the Legal Intelligencer reports. The change could permanently alter life for new associates, who will be hired in fewer numbers and paid less, according to one law firm consultant.

The publication describes the new model as one in which several senior associates and junior partners “make up the bulk in the middle,” conjuring images of a pear rather than a diamond.

Law firm consultant Ward Bower of Altman Weil summarized the likely effects of the change for the Intelligencer. Law firms will be hiring smaller first-year classes and will be billing less of their time to clients. New associates will likely bill clients at a lower rate, and there won’t be a billable hours expectation until the new hires have a year or two of experience.

And that means lower starting salaries for first-years, followed by fairly quick increases for those who are valued, Bower said.

The article cites an example of a firm that has already tried a similar approach. Five years ago, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott abandoned the notion of hiring first-year associates, generally hiring only second- or third-years. The firm’s CEO, Timothy Ryan, made the change to avoid paying costly starting salaries to lawyers just learning the ropes and to avoid losing associates after bearing the costs of training.

“Whether it was luck or intuition, Ryan now seems to have been ahead of the curve,” the story says.

Comments

1.

TN
May 12, 2009 8:23 AM CST

Law firm consultants are a vile and despicable lot… they are what is wrong with the legal field today.  Wasn’t it consultants who were telling firms to give outrageous pay to incoming associates a few years back?  And it is not like the vile consultants were giving any new ideas a few years back on restructuring law firms except to merge and get bigger and to keep the billable hour.

Flag this comment

2.

B. McLeod
May 12, 2009 8:38 AM CST

There is no curve in a diamond, so Ryan must be using the “pear” variant.  I think a tesseract structure may become more common.  In any event, the firms and consultants need to behave themselves and stop upending models.

Flag this comment

3.

EG
May 12, 2009 6:35 PM CST

Current law practice is an antiquated business structure anyway following the same model as a 17th century French Brothel- Pick the one you want and pay by the hour. It is time for a change anyway- as a former GC I can say that the service/advice I’ve received from Blue Chip-Mega Firms based on what we paid was criminal. We switched to small boutique specialty firms with lawyers smart enough to get out of big firm life and it was the best move we ever made!

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.