• Home
  • News
  • Sarah Palin Supporters Make ‘Loony Claim’ Against Obama ‘Operatives’

Executive Branch

Sarah Palin Supporters Make ‘Loony Claim’ Against Obama ‘Operatives’

Posted Sep 16, 2008 5:02 PM CST
By Martha Neil

In what a columnist for U.S. News & World Report describes as a "loony claim," a former press secretary for Republican vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin is contending that "operatives" of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama "hijacked" the Alaska investigation of Palin's alleged improper firing of the state's police chief.

"Rarely in the annals of American political history have claims so farfetched been made by a high-level aide, whether present or former," writes Bonnie Erbe, a magazine contributing editor. "Remember, dear readers, the Palin investigation was launched well before Palin was on the McCain team, and at a time when her name as a vice presidential prospect was barely being mentioned."

However, other supporters of the Alaska governor have gone a step further and made a similar claim in a press release today about a lawsuit filed over the investigation:

The probe of Palin by her state's legislature "is being led by outspoken supporters of Barack Obama and members of the Democratic Party," the press release states. In its headline, it characterizes the investigation—which focuses on Palin's claimed pressuring of state public safety commissioner Walt Monegan to fire her brother-in-law from his state trooper job during a difficult divorce from Palin's sister—as a "McCarthy-style inquisition."

Allegedly due to Monegan's refusal to fire her brother-in-law, Palin fired Monegan.

The lawsuit contends that the investigation violates Palin's right to due process and the state constitution by using the Alaska Legislative Council to further partisan politics.

As discussed in an earlier ABAJournal.com post, the deciding vote in a 3-2 vote last week by the state senate judiciary committee to subpoena Palin's husband, Todd, and 12 others who have refused to cooperate with the investigation was cast by a Republican.

Earlier, Palin had said she welcomed the investigation, which was initially approved by a bipartisan group of state legislators, reports an Associated Press article about the lawsuit. But now she wants to delay it until after the November presidential election.

"The matter risks casting a shadow on Palin's reputation, central to her appeal in the campaign, that she is a clean-government advocate who takes on entrenched interests—not a governor who tried to use her authority behind the scenes to settle a personal score," the news agency writes.

Additional coverage:

ABC News: "Fired Official: Governor Sarah Palin Did Not Tell the Truth to ABC"

CNN: "Palin allies sue to halt trooper probe"

Reuters: "Alaska Republicans sue to stop Palin trooper probe"

Comments

1.

Ellen Barshevsky
Sep 17, 2008 5:48 AM CST

This is another news story gone political. While I don’t think Mrs. Palin has as many credentials as other women, she is a woman and should be given a chance without all of the BASHING that would NOT happen if she was a man.

Men do this kind of thing and everyone just yawns and walks away, But if a WOMAN does anything, she is srewtinized so CLOSELY for her activities?

Why are there 2 standards? One for men and a MUCH HIGHER standard for WOMEN?  Should this be the case.  My boyfriend told me that the men in his office regularly joke about this and it is NOT RIGHT.  He does not join into the frey, as he agrees there should be ONE STANDARD of EQUALITY FOR MEN AND THE SAME STANDARD FOR WOMEN.

WHY IS THIS SO DIFFICULT FOR EVERYONE TO IMPLIMENT?  EVERYONE EQUAL—ONE STANDARD FOR ALL.

Flag this comment

2.

Native New Yorker
Sep 17, 2008 9:46 AM CST

Ellen:  Palin’s former press secretary opened this can of worms. Sexism, double standards and Barack Obama have nothing to do with Sarah Palin using her position to ruin other people’s lives.  The referenced article only further supports a negative image of Ms. Palin.  The word “loony” is appropriate and in light of the truth, kind.

Flag this comment

3.

associate
Sep 17, 2008 10:44 AM CST

ABA bias is showing again.

I missed the story about the Barack asking the Iraqi Interior Minister to delay troop reductions until after the election.

This story seems to also be missing some of the background, including that the 3-2 Republican tie breaker is one of the guys that was hurt when Palin cut off the back room dealings that were so prominent in Alaska.

There have been lots of details and stories left out on this journal lately.  Curiously, none of the omissions have been favorable to Palin or McCain.  I suppose that’s just coincidence though, right?

Flag this comment

4.

associate
Sep 17, 2008 10:46 AM CST

Wow, I missed the part where you left out that the ex-brother in law was found to have been DUI in his state issued patrol car and making threats against Palin’s family and received a total of 5 days of suspension for those actions.

That’s a pretty bad hack and whack job, even for an ABA journal post.

Flag this comment

5.

Political JD
Sep 17, 2008 12:08 PM CST

Palin won’t honor subpoeanas??  Bush won’t honor subpoenas??

I’m not honoring warrants so what’s the big deal?

Flag this comment

6.

blibo
Sep 18, 2008 10:15 AM CST

You canna subpoeana da MOOSE!!!!

http://www.cafepress.com/sarahpalinteez

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.