Article

Ambiguous Retainer Equals No Fee


A federal judge has ruled that New York law requires a lawyer’s ambiguous retainer agreement to be read in favor of the client.

As a result, Barry Fredericks won’t be able to collect a contingency fee for a case that lost on a motion for summary judgment, then settled while an appeal was pending, the New York Law Journal reports. The appeal had been filed by another lawyer.

Fredericks represented a company in a contract dispute with Slim-Fast over an agreement to distribute products in Israel.

Previous:
States Don’t See ‘Vanishing Trials’

Next:
A School Desegregated Is Still Divided


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.