Women in the Law
Female Lawyers with Masculine Names May Have a Better Shot at Judgeships
Posted Sep 3, 2009 7:45 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Women lawyers with masculine-sounding first names have better odds of becoming a judge than their counterparts with feminine names, at least in South Carolina, according to a study by two economics researchers.
The study finds that changing a woman’s name from something feminine, such as Sue, to a gender-ambiguous name such as Kelly increased the odds of becoming a South Carolina judge by about 5 percent, the Vancouver Sun reports. Changing the name Sue to a predominantly male name such as Cameron tripled the odds of becoming a judge, and changing it to Bruce increased the odds by a factor of five.
The researchers suggest the reason for the odds may be the “Portia hypothesis,” named for the Shakespeare character who disguises herself as a man to argue a court case, according to excerpts of the study posted by the Situationist. The theory holds that those females with male-sounding names are more successful in legal careers than females with feminine-sounding names.
"When we see a masculine name, something in our subconscious is cued," said one of the study authors, economics professor Bentley Coffey of Clemson University in South Carolina. "There seems to be a subtle sexist notion, even if it's not gender discrimination per se," he told the Vancouver Sun.
Coffey told the Sun that he and his wife, a lawyer, were so swayed by the study findings that they named their daughter Collins.
Coffey and research fellow Patrick McLaughlin of George Mason University put together their list of masculine-sounding female names by examining South Carolina voter records. The records showed how often a name was exclusively male and how often it was assigned to both genders, according to a preliminary copy of the study (PDF) posted by the Situationist. The researchers looked at websites and interviewed law clerks to determine which South Carolina judges are female.
Besides Bruce, Kelly and Cameron, male-sounding first names of South Carolina judges included Barney, Dale, Leslie, Jan and Rudell.
The study, published in American Law and Economics Review, is called “Do Masculine Names Help Female Lawyers Become Judges? Evidence from South Carolina.” As of November 2007, South Carolina had 156 male judges and 52 female judges, the study says.
Legal Blog Watch points out that the theory doesn’t appear to hold true for the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor and retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor all have feminine-sounding names.

Comments
Heidi
Sep 3, 2009 7:59 AM CST
This does not surprise me at all. Years ago I was told by a fellow attorney that I would have a better chance for success in the law if I changed my name from “Heidi” (cute, adorable, Shirley Temple connnotations) to “Helga” (scary, valkyrie). I am still Heidi .
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Sep 3, 2009 8:03 AM CST
Maybe “Brunhilde”?
Flag this comment
Heidi
Sep 3, 2009 8:24 AM CST
Excellent!!. That would definitiely strike fear into the heart of my opposing counsel.
Flag this comment
J.D.
Sep 3, 2009 8:36 AM CST
I dunno. “Bentley Coffey” sounds pretty effeminate, so I’m not sure how that might affect hiring…
Flag this comment
khazeh
Sep 3, 2009 8:41 AM CST
Geez. Glad I don’t want to be a judge, or I’d have to change my first name to “Serpico”.
Flag this comment
tim
Sep 3, 2009 12:04 PM CST
I clerked for a state supreme court judge who changed her name just so it would look better on the ballet.
There is truth to how voters pick canidates if they don’t know anything about them.
Flag this comment
AndytheLawyer
Sep 3, 2009 2:35 PM CST
There is a lawyer in California named (no joke here) Cupcake Brown. Look it up. I look forward to her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Flag this comment
Marina
Sep 4, 2009 5:23 AM CST
Poor Collins…she might become a judge after all, not because of her name but because of the miserable childhood she will have. Adolescent identity crisis + mocking by other kids is guaranteed. How incredibly stupid…
Flag this comment
R.P.
Sep 4, 2009 6:13 AM CST
Let’s ask Hon. Candy Dale of the District Court in Idaho how she feels about this.
Flag this comment
Guana Ubangee
Sep 4, 2009 6:29 AM CST
Yes, women who sound and look like men are more valuable on the ranch to pull their weight. Who needs feminity when you can get one who looks and has the strength of a plow horse? I will select the waterbuffalo every time over the dainty female. She can bear more children.
Flag this comment
ftb
Sep 4, 2009 6:40 AM CST
When I was starting out as a lawyer almost 30 years ago, I encountered a guy in a major firm that if I really wanted to be a lawyer, I should have a sex change operation. Well, I suppose if it worked for him, it could work for me. I remember him from Girl Scouts when his name was Mary. . .
Flag this comment
Alex
Sep 4, 2009 6:59 AM CST
Shennanigans.
Flag this comment
Ronnie
Sep 4, 2009 7:03 AM CST
What about obviously ambiguous names like Aaron and Erin? This is my first name, but it’s spelled neither way. Although I’m female, it’s spelled closer to the male spelling, and most people assume I’m male, notwithstanding checking off the “Female” box or whatever. I wonder if it’s neutral.
Flag this comment
cheryl
Sep 4, 2009 7:09 AM CST
And how about if you have an ethnic sounding name, you will not even get an interview!!
Flag this comment
Kristin
Sep 4, 2009 7:39 AM CST
Here in Chicago, you have to have an Irish name if you want to be elected judge.
Flag this comment
Hope
Sep 4, 2009 8:26 AM CST
Being from SC where the study was conducted, this is just the kind of crap CU would study. They didn’t bother to mention that one of our most successful judges currently sitting on the 4th Cir. Court of Appeals first name is “Karen.” Real masculine.
Flag this comment
Hadley V. Baxendale
Sep 4, 2009 8:27 AM CST
If the conclusion is valid, it shows human nature at work and that “enlightenment” may soften, but won’t change it. We self-select those who are like us. But once the people choosing the candidates are predominantly female, the tide will turn, and there will be more “Mary’s” on the bench than “William’s” but as before, lots of “Pat’s.”
Surveys show that children with the home-made ethnic names are discriminated against, subconsciously, (so why would a parent handicap a child by naming him “Tylenol” or “Niquil”?) So these results are consistent and not surprising.
One factor that may affect this survey—it was done in South Carolina, where there is a tradition of naming the second son with the mother’s maiden (last) name, so there are a lot of first-named Tucker’s, Powell’s, and Johnston’s. When the people selecting judges see these androgynous names they may assume a white traditional background without regard for gender.
A final thought: it’s sad that someone would choose her child’s name so she can be a judge. On the other hand, we all know that if you want your son to grow up tough, you have to name him “Sue.”
Flag this comment
Sheila
Sep 4, 2009 8:30 AM CST
Kelly, Dale, Leslie and Jan are MALE-sounding names? Sorry, but I think they’re about as ambiguous as they come—unless you want to add Robin…
Flag this comment
Paige
Sep 4, 2009 8:47 AM CST
Not totally surprising. But I do find it interesting that the female supreme court justices have feminine names. My current theory is that if you don’t have to meet the candidate, she should try to be masculine and slip under the gender radar. But if you’re running for an appointed position, pull out the conservative heels, skirt, pearls, hairdo and all.
Flag this comment
R.P.
Sep 4, 2009 8:50 AM CST
Best names for a sure win in a judicial election in the South
1. Dale Earnhardt
2. Richard Petty
3. Jeff Gordon
Flag this comment
Tom
Sep 4, 2009 9:14 AM CST
In the last two rounds of elections in Kentucky for intermediate appellate seats, Janet, Denise, Donna, Joy,and Michelle prevailed over male opponents. Kelly, a male judge prevailed over a male opponent. Sara was unopposed. On the Supreme Court, Mary and Lisa prevailed over John and Jim.
Flag this comment
dzippy
Sep 4, 2009 9:33 AM CST
Say what you will, but I always have thought certain girlie names were an impediment to being taken seriously, which is what this is really all about in the end…Tiffany, Amber, Crystal, Brittney…yes, and Candy, just create expectations of potentially bubble headed girly girls. That doesn’t mean we should have to give our daughters male names, just ones that are viewed with more gravity and that are stronger sounding…Elizabeth has always had my vote (and is my daughter’s name, though I confess to giving her the girly middle name of Courtney though I hear now there are men with that name!)
Flag this comment
Carrie
Sep 4, 2009 9:37 AM CST
Whatever. Tell it to Sandra, Ruth and Sonia.
Flag this comment
Susan Medwied
Sep 4, 2009 10:42 AM CST
Well, duh, of course it ‘helps;’ doesn’t mean it’s right or you do it. My first law partner, Jane, regulary received mail from opposing counsel addressed to “Zane.” I guess 33 years ago male attorneys just couldn’t imagine a female opposing counsel.
Flag this comment
duh
Sep 4, 2009 11:10 AM CST
Poster #17 is right - this study was done by CU professors who apparently did not have an “outside of SC” lens to filter it through. Not only because of the second son maiden name thing, but also because SC is still an immensely sexist and racist state. The cues to the public with those ambiguous names suggest either male or white judicial candidates, both of which are preferred in South Carolinia over any other candidate. I would do this study in any other state above the Mason-Dixon line to see if it has any statistical, rather than regional significance, before using it to choose my child’s name. Unless you live in South Carolina - then make your kid’s name as white and male as possible (not that it will help when they have to actually step in front of the camera).
Flag this comment
Justin in Seattle
Sep 4, 2009 12:05 PM CST
That’s disturbing to me. We elect our judges in Washington, too, and here in Seattle it’s quite the opposite to this South Carolina situation. In fact, analysts here always state that females have a significant advantage over male judicial candidates .
Flag this comment
HVB
Sep 4, 2009 12:11 PM CST
Justin—would that be because more voters in those elections are female?
As I said, it’s human nature to self-select. It’s equally “prejudiced” “sexist” and “discriminatory” for a male to select a male as it is for a female to select a female. But it’s the reality.
Flag this comment
Porcupine
Sep 4, 2009 1:03 PM CST
Maybe this is a regional thing; it’s certainly not true in PA, where all the judges are elected. Twelve of the 28 sitting appellate judges are women, with names like Debra, Jane, Kate, Joan, Mary Jane, Susan, Christine, Jackie, Cheryl, Bonnie, Hannah and Renee. There is at least a perceived advantage for women running for the judiciary in PA. One male candidate even chose to run for office using his nickname “Robin” rather than his given name, “Robert”. He won.
Flag this comment
KY Lawyer
Sep 4, 2009 1:32 PM CST
I don’t know about judge’s first names, but I recently sent out about 50 resumes. On some resumes I used my initials & on others I used my first (clearly feminine) name. The response was much higher for the resumes using my initials—I assume the recipients thought I was male (particularly since they addressed their responses to me as “Dear Mr. ___).
I have to attribute this to pure, unmitigated sexism, since the resumes were otherwise absolutely the same.
Flag this comment
HVB
Sep 4, 2009 2:09 PM CST
KY, the same thing happens with resumes with familiar names versus ethnic-sounding names, esp. the made-up names.
Flag this comment
Joe Momma
Sep 4, 2009 2:42 PM CST
I find that when I send my resumes out, people want to fight me. Can’t imagine what’s going to happen when I run for the judiciary.
Flag this comment
J.D.
Sep 4, 2009 2:51 PM CST
30 makes a good point. I’d like to see a study on “ethnic-sounding” names during the law school application process. If I were to submit the same application, with a boring name and a ethnic name, what might the result be?
Flag this comment
KY Lawyer
Sep 4, 2009 6:05 PM CST
I never thought about ethnic-sounding names making a difference in hiring - but apparently it does. You’re right 32- someone should confirm this with a scientific study. Wonder what hiring partners would say on this subject?
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Sep 4, 2009 9:28 PM CST
I cannot well do much about the “ethnic-sounding” stuff. If I walk into an interview and note that the apparel of the interviewers reflects a predominance of Campbell of Argyll or MacDonald of Sleat tartan, I try to gracefully remain near the door.
Flag this comment
W. Stoddard
Sep 8, 2009 9:31 AM CST
I am a native of SC, a CU graduate and have practiced law for 34 years. I do not agree with the study from my alma mater. Our Judges are not elected by the public but are elected by our State legislature.The female attorneys who have risen to Circuit Court judicial posts in our state include the following: Deadra, Kristi,Diane, Carmen, Michelle,Alison, Cynthia, Anne, Angela, Agnes, Dotothy, Leslie,Donna,Jocelyn, Judy,Deborah, Rochelle, Lettia and Georgia.
Which ones of these are supposed to be masculine sounding?
I think the facts speak for themselves. I do regret that there is still so much prejudice espoused by other bloggers against the South The custom in my state is for some couples to name one of their daughters with the wife’s maiden name as the child’s first name- not the son, but this tradition is disappearing as more and more young couples prefer not to use family names .
Flag this comment
Esq.
Sep 8, 2009 1:26 PM CST
I agree that ethnic names can be an impediment to law-firm positions. I have a lot of Asian and Southeast Asian friends who have taken to using an Anglo “nickname” as their first name because interviewers can’t be bothered to learn how to pronounce their given names. I have several African-American acquaintances who use their first initial and middle name because the first name is very ethnic.
And in all honestly, in New York City, and most of downstate New York, your last name can be either as asset or an impediment to running for office (inlcuding Judge). It’s a huge asset to be Hispanic in the Bronx, Asian in Queens, Carribben or Italian in Brooklyn, and Jewish in Long Island.
Flag this comment
Wish it was Jane
Sep 11, 2009 1:38 PM CST
Please, mamas, don’t give your girl babies masculine names! My mother did it to me, albeit unknowingly - she got the name from a friend’s daughter, so I guess ultimately it’s her friend’s fault. To make matters worse, the name is both somewhat ethnic and commonly used as a last name (so when people don’t think I’m male, they think my first name is my last name and vice versa). Confusion abounds.
I haven’t been practicing long, but it’s already become clear that this is a professional liability for me. Unfortunately, it’s too late at this point in my life to change it.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.