Evidence

Judge orders confiscation of traffic cameras


image

Image from Shutterstock.

A Hamilton County (Cincinnati) judge slammed the tiny village of Elmwood Place and the company it uses to issue camera-caught speeding tickets, in effect saying they ran right through his judicial STOP sign.

County Common Pleas Court Judge Robert Ruehlman had ruled back in March that using cameras to ticket speeders without pulling them over was unconstitutional, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported. The setup had poured more than $1 million into the coffers of Elmwood Place, population 2,200. The judge said stop.

The ticketing continued. Judge Ruehlman cited both the village and Optotraffic, a Maryland-based speed enforcement company, for contempt. He also ordered that the cameras be seized.

If the parties repay the $48,500 collected since his March order, he’ll drop the contempt charges.

One day earlier, Ohio’s lower legislative House approved a bill that would prohibit local governments from using cameras to ticket speeders and red-light runners.

Despite positive statistics touted by auto insurers—they say these devices result in significant deterrence—there is a growing backlash against automated traffic-law enforcement.

As of February, more than 100 legislative bills were filed in 22 states to curtail use of traffic cameras, reports the Stateline daily news service of the Pew Charitable trusts.

Previous:
How many barrels of oil were spilled in BP's Gulf well? Judge must decide

Next:
State appeals judge sanctioned over letter to parole board for 'friend'


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.