Labor & Employment

Law Grad Loses Suit Seeking Overtime Pay for Work as Clerk at Law Firm


California employers aren’t legally required to pay licensed professionals time-and-a-half for working overtime.

But that rule doesn’t apply to an unlicensed clerk doing similar work for a law firm, a law school graduate successfully contended in a Marin County lawsuit. Yesterday, however, an appeals court overruled that decision, reports the San Francisco Chronicle.

Because Matthew Zelasko-Barrett employed “a significant level of discretion” while working as a clerk for the Brayton-Purcell law firm before he passed the state bar exam, it wasn’t required to pay overtime, the First District Court of Appeal in San Francisco held in a unanimous decision.

Zelasko-Barrett referred the newspaper’s request for comment to his lawyer, who wasn’t immediately available.

A Metropolitan News-Enterprise article provides more details and Leagle provides a copy of the opinion.

Updated on Aug. 19 to link to Metropolitan News-Enterprise article and Leagle opinion copy.


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy and the ABA Code of Conduct.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.