• Home
  • News
  • Souter Decries Lack of Civics Knowledge, Plans to Do Something About it

Judiciary

Souter Decries Lack of Civics Knowledge, Plans to Do Something About it

Posted May 21, 2009 7:13 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

Justice David H. Souter has in the past avoided the limelight. But in a speech yesterday at Georgetown Law Center decrying Americans’ lack of civic knowledge, the retiring justice demonstrated his speaking prowess.

Souter warned that the republic "can be lost, it is being lost, it is lost, if it is not understood,” the National Law Journal reports. He cited surveys showing about two-thirds of Americans can’t even name the three branches of government, one of the basic lessons he learned as a youth at town hall meetings in Weare, N.H., according to the Washington Times and the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.

What is needed, he said, is "the restoration of the self-identity of the American people."

The National Law Journal says Souter outshone other speakers at the conference, convened by retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor to address the need for an independent judiciary. “Souter's was the most dramatic talk, winning a prolonged standing ovation from several hundred lawyers and judges from around the country,” the legal newspaper says. “O'Connor was visibly moved by Souter's remarks.”

Souter did not allow broadcast of his speech, however, and “politely declined” interview requests, according to the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.

The public doesn't respect the judiciary when there is little basic knowledge about government, Souter asserted. He said he has joined a committee that will revise the civics curriculum for public schools in New Hampshire. "If I can do it, you can do it too," he said.

Comments

1.

J.D.
May 21, 2009 7:42 AM CST

Yes, well the leftist educational groups are quite obviously to blame. Instead of learning American History, students are being taught that Western Civilization is “evil”—from grade school through college.

It’s gotten so bad that we now have student groups starting up called “Youth for Western Civilization” as a response to students marching through campuses with signs reading “Down with Western Civ!”

It’s pretty clear which ideology is pushing this anti-West, anti-capitalist, anti-American garbage. And it’s no surprise that people are not learning basic civics. Souter is right that the Republic “can be lost, it is being lost”—that’s the very goal these “educators” are trying to achieve!

Flag this comment

2.

T.R.
May 21, 2009 8:47 AM CST

Souter is absolutely correct.

However, a lack of civic knowledge is largely the result of poor educational standards and the disaffection of youth. Both of these have been caused/exacerbated by the right-wing agenda of cutting public spending.

U.S. students need to learn about other cultures and traditions if they are to become well-rounded citizens. The suggestion that teaching a world-view is ‘anti-West’ or ‘anti-American’ is outrageous.

Knowledge of the world promotes tolerance and understanding. Ignorance, however, promotes bigotry and facism. I, for one, choose knowledge.

Flag this comment

3.

J.D.
May 21, 2009 9:38 AM CST

T.R., I suspect you’ve been away from a classroom for quite some time. What exactly is influencing college students to march with “Down with Western Civilization!” signs, in your opinion?

And do you not consider students being taught that the SW United States was “stolen from Mexico” as a form of ignorance? Here’s a little sample from a Latino teacher raising the red flag at Tuscon High School:

“During the 2002-2003 school year, I taught a U.S. history course with a Mexican-American perspective. The course was part of the Raza/Chicano studies department. I was expected only to assign grades. The Raza studies department staff would teach the class. Immediately it was clear that the class was not a U.S. history course, which the state of Arizona requires for graduation.

“The basic theme of the curriculum was that Mexican-Americans were and continue to be victims of a racist American society driven by the interests of middle and upper-class whites. In this narrative, whites are able to maintain their influence only if minorities are held down. Thus, social, political and economic events in America must be understood through this lens.

“This biased and sole paradigm justified teaching that our community police officers are an extension of the white power structure and that they are the strongmen used “to keep minorities in their ghettos.

“It justified telling the class that there are fewer Mexican-Americans in Tucson Magnet High School’s advanced placement courses because their ‘white teachers’ do not believe they are capable and do not want them to get ahead.

“It justified teaching that the Southwestern United States was taken from Mexicans because of the insatiable greed of the Yankee who acquired his values from the corrupted ethos of Western civilization.

“It was taught that the Southwest is ‘Atzlan,’ the ancient homeland of the Aztecs, and still rightfully belongs to their descendants - to all people of indigenous Mexican heritage.

“As an educator, I refused to be complicit in a curriculum that engendered racial hostility, irresponsibly demeaned America’s civil institutions, undermined our public servants, discounted any virtues in Western civilization and taught disdain for American sovereignty.

“When I raised these concerns, I was told that I was a ‘racist,’ despite being Hispanic. Acknowledging my heritage, the Raza studies staff also informed me that I was a vendido, the Spanish term for ‘sellout.’”

THE SAME SCHOOL regularly buses students to illegal alien amnesty protests, and Dolores Huerta, co-founder of the United Farm Workers, tells students there that “Republicans hate Latinos.”

JUST NOT enough time in the day to talk about those trivial “separation of powers” and such.

And yes, I’d say the people running these “Raza” schools are quite anti-American.

http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/ss/opinion/85853.php

http://www.kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=4746419&nav=HMO6HMaY

Partial list of schools advocating Marxism, racial separatism, and anti-American sentiment. Don’t kill the messenger:

http://michellemalkin.com/2006/07/12/aztlan-academy-coming-to-your-neighborhood/

Flag this comment

4.

Andy the Lawyer
May 21, 2009 12:19 PM CST

Since JD is anxious to improve the quality of education by removing senseless ideology -based material from the classroom, I look forward to his damning rejection of school board imbeciles that want creationism taught alongside evolution.

Flag this comment

5.

J.D.
May 21, 2009 3:30 PM CST

I’d like to see T.R.‘s response to that one, Andy. Since he wants “knowledge” I suspect he’d want both evolution and creationism mentioned. After all, the more information the better, no?

But please, resist the stereotypes. I’m a firm believer in evolution, but the fact is it’s a theory with a lot of holes. No science is really ever settled, and at the same time, I really don’t see any conflict between a creationist or evolutionist theory. Certainly both can be true—evolution happens after creation… perhaps.

Flag this comment

6.

LLM
May 21, 2009 4:36 PM CST

It is those theories of physics that get me—like Einstein’s theory of relativity.  Is there a creationism version of the time-space continuum?

Flag this comment

7.

B. McLeod
May 21, 2009 8:52 PM CST

How many times have you been stuck in traffic, behind somebody fumbling around all over their control panel looking for the the “repeat” on the CD player?  I think if somebody is going to drive a Civic (especially a hybrid, or for that matter, any of these complicated new cars), he or she truly ought to read the owner’s manual in advance.  It will save a lot of grief in the long haul.  Souter is absolutely right.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.