U.S. Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Federal Suits for Nuisance Telemarketing


A Florida man who claims he was hounded by a financial services company trying to collect a student loan may sue in federal court, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled.

Marcus Mims of Fort Lauderdale had filed a federal suit for violations of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, which authorizes private suits in state courts. In a unanimous opinion (PDF), Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote that state courts don’t have exclusive jurisdiction.

“We find no convincing reason to read into the TCPA’s permissive grant of jurisdiction to state courts any barrier to the U. S. district courts’ exercise of the general federal-question jurisdiction they have possessed since 1875,” Ginsburg said.

Mims had claimed the debt collector violated federal law by using an automatic telephone dialing system or artificial voice to call his cell phone without his consent.

The case is Mims v. Arrow Financial Services. Courthouse News Service and the Associated Press covered the decision.

Previous:
Supreme Court Upholds Recopyright Law; Breyer and Alito Note 'Speech Implications' in Dissent

Next:
Did the SOPA / PIPA Internet Blackout Protest Affect Your Workday?


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.