• Home
  • News
  • Suspected Serial Killer Charged in Only 2 Murders Due to Damaged DNA

Evidence

Suspected Serial Killer Charged in Only 2 Murders Due to Damaged DNA

Posted May 22, 2009 12:31 PM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss

A 72-year-old insurance adjuster said to be a suspect in as many as 30 murders has been charged with just two killings because DNA evidence from the other cases has been damaged.

When John Floyd Thomas Jr. was charged last month, Detective Richard Bengston of the Los Angeles Police Department said he could be “Los Angeles' most prolific serial killer." But now he tells the New York Times he will be investigating for a long time. “This is a career case,” he said.

More traditional investigative techniques will have to be used because DNA found at three other crime scenes yielded less than definitive results, the Times says. The material had deteriorated, yielding only partial matches to Thomas’ genetic profile. Prosecutors are hesitant to file charges, and detectives will have to find corroborative evidence before there will be any additional murder charges, the Times says.

A complete DNA match is usually based on an analysis of 13 locations, or loci, on the human chromosome, the story explains. The odds of two unrelated people sharing the same 13 loci are estimated to be one in four quadrillion.

When a DNA sample is deteriorated, fewer loci can be analyzed, and when there is a match, it is said to be partial. Only three or four loci have been matched in Thomas’ case, Bengston told the newspaper.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
May 23, 2009 7:38 AM CST

This should not be a “career case.”  The suspect is 72.  They only need to get him on a few of these.  There is no point in allocating resources to have a detective or detectives spend a career continuing to firm up dozens of additional cases simply out of morbid curiousity.  They need to stop piddling around with the files that are solved, and focus on stopping other killers who are still killing.  This isn’t about the detective’s book deal.

Flag this comment

2.

Wichita Watcher
May 24, 2009 6:47 AM CST

What? Of course they need to confirm which cold cases are attributed to him so those cases can be CLOSED.  The remaining cases need to remain OPEN.  This case is another example of killers continuing to kill over decades.  Times have changed and science is now allowing police to see just how important cold cases are in solving CURRENT cases too.  For those he didn’t commit there is still a killer out there and once a killer always a killer.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.