• Home
  • News
  • UK & Australia Firms Mull Megamergers to Amp Up in Asia

International Law

UK & Australia Firms Mull Megamergers to Amp Up in Asia

Posted Oct 7, 2009 4:54 PM CST
By Martha Neil

A planned 2010 merger of London-based Norton Rose with Australia's Deacons law firm is giving their competitors on both continents considerable food for thought.

Together, the Norton Rose-Deacons combination will have some 1,500 lawyers, but the major import of the planned merger is the head start it could provide for aggressive expansion in Asia, reports the American Lawyer.

The BigLaw legal market in Australia, which until recently had been regarded by global legal partnerships as something of a law firm backwater, offers not only multicultural and multilingual expertise and geographic proximity to Asia, but lower costs: Associates at some large Australian firms earn as little as $50,000, the legal publication reports.

The struggling global economy put an end to merger talks between Clifford Chance and Mallesons Stephen Jaques that could have created a 4,000-attorney international law firm, Mallesons chief executive partner Robert Milliner tells American Lawyer. But other such combinations of London- and Australia-based law firms may be on the horizon, the magazine says.

While Australian law firms could, of course, amp up in Asia on their own--as some, such as 1,000-attorney Mallesons are already doing--many instead will opt to merge with major United Kingdom- and United States-based international partnerships, following the Deacons lead, predicts Peter Martyr, the chief executive of Norton Rose.

"This is an early play for us to gain a weight of people and resources in that part of the world," he says of the impact he expects the merger with Deacons to have on his firm's practice in Asia.

Comments

1.

B. McLeod
Oct 7, 2009 5:19 PM CST

“Associates at some large Australian firms earn as little as $50,000, the legal publication reports.”  Firms must have a great deal more sense in Australia than here.  I really like that Fosters ESB, too.

Flag this comment

2.

Pious Cant
Oct 7, 2009 6:52 PM CST

Because Australian law firms are so abjectly lousy with associate pay, many of their best and brightest leave Australia for the US, UK and Asia.

As for bilingual/bicultural skills, read any Australian government or industry report on the matter and you will find that Australian law firms, like most other businesses, are monolingual Anglo-Saxon throwbacks to a bygone era.

Even in terms of proximity to Asia, the numbers don’t stack up. A flight from Los Angeles to just about any NE Asian capital is closer than Sydney or Melbourne.

Flag this comment

3.

B. McLeod
Oct 7, 2009 9:35 PM CST

Ha, ha!  Sure!  That’s why Australia has nearly shut doon, for the want o’ all those “best and brightest.”  Iesu!  How can you even spew that defecation wi’ a straight face?

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.