U.S. Supreme Court

Which stocks are SCOTUS justices picking?


Ruth Bader Ginsburg is the wealthiest U.S. Supreme Court justice, with a reported net worth of up to $18.1 million.

Rather than holding individual stocks, Ginsburg has most of her money in mutual funds and retirement accounts, the Center for Public Integrity reports. But a few other justices have notable holdings. According to the story, they include:

• Two justices own gold or silver-related securities. They are Justice Antonin Scalia, ranked fifth with a net worth of up to $4.2 million, and Justice Clarence Thomas, the seventh-wealthiest justice with a net worth of up to $1.8 million.

• Stephen G. Breyer is the second wealthiest justice, with a net worth of up to $17.1 million. Most of his assets are in mutual funds, bonds and retirement accounts. But he also has a stake valued at $1 million to $5 million in Pearson, a publishing company that owns the Penguin Group and the Financial Times. He also has holdings in a fund that invests in Asian tech companies. Last year he sold his stock in biotech company Amgen, gaining between $15,000 and $50,000, allowing him to rule in a case on class action certification.

• Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., ranked fourth with a net worth of up to $6.6 million, invests in tech and telecommunications companies, including Time Warner, Microsoft, Texas Instruments, T-Mobile and Sirius XM Radio.

• Justice Sonia Sotomayor is now ranked third with a net worth of up to $10.3 million. That’s a big jump from her net worth in 2009, when her financial holdings consisted of a checking and savings account worth between $50,000 and $115,000 altogether. The 2009 disclosure did not include the value of Sotomayor’s primary residence in New York, however. It’s now considered an asset—and it’s valued at up to $5 million—because she rents out the property. (She still has a mortgage on the property.) She also has earned more than $3 million in royalties for her memoir.

• The least wealthy justice is Anthony M. Kennedy, with assets valued up to $700,000.

Previous:
Recess-appointments case among possible cert grants

Next:
A Scalia turnabout? Justice authors opinion striking down Arizona voter requirement


We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy. Flag comment for moderator.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.