Women in the Law
Would-Be Attorney Headed to Harvard Grew Up in Homeless Shelters
Posted Jun 23, 2009 2:27 PM CST
By Martha Neil
Growing up in California, Khadijah Williams had to take an unusual amount of responsibility for running her own life, under highly daunting circumstances.
Williams' mother, who is only 14 years older, encouraged Williams and told her she had the ability to be a major success in life. However, she couldn't provide much stability. Williams, her younger sister and her mother lived in homeless shelters, motels and armories as Williams attended 12 schools in 12 years, reports the Los Angeles Times.
"She finished only half of fourth grade, half of fifth and skipped sixth. Seventh grade was split between Los Angeles and San Diego. Eighth grade consisted of two weeks in San Bernardino," the newspaper recounts.
Inspired to focus on her education when she scored very high on a statewide test and was categorized as gifted at age 9, Williams eventually reached out to organizations and mentors when she was in high school. As a result, she was able to spend her final years before college in the same high school, enabling her to get the recommendations she needed to win admission to Harvard University—on a full scholarship. In addition to her academic activities, she was also a leader on her high school's track and field team.
She graduated from high school this month with a 4.0 average, ranking fourth in her class. After she graduates from college, she hopes to earn her juris doctor degree and practice education law, the newspaper reports.
Despite her amazing educational success, Williams still faces personal challenges. She sees her mother only occasionally, and doesn't feel particularly close to her classmates, although she is friendly with them and many have sought her help with their homework.
"It's a nice, glossy, shiny, colorful yearbook," she says of her high school's yearbook. "But it feels like they're all strangers. I'm nowhere in these pages."
Related earlier coverage:
ABAJournal.com: "Traffic Ticket, Friends and True Grit Helped Single Mom Become Lawyer"
ABAJournal.com: "Single Mom at 14, Law Grad at 24"

Comments
Cynic
Jun 23, 2009 8:31 PM CST
In a related story, would-be attorney who graduated from Northeastern Law School moves to a homeless shelter because the “public interest law school” costs $65,000/year.
Flag this comment
joe
Jun 24, 2009 9:39 AM CST
Congrats but did the white girl who was number 3 in the class get rejected from Harvard so this minority could get in?
Flag this comment
Heidi O
Jun 24, 2009 10:04 AM CST
Joe: “This minority?” Having read closely through the article I see no mention of Ms. Williams being a minority. Frankly, if Ms. Williams managed to graduate #4 after having missed, by all appearances, about half of her primary schooling, it appears that Harvard is the one that is gaining the benefit from this association.
Flag this comment
person
Jun 24, 2009 10:11 AM CST
In before affirmative action wan…
Never mind.
Flag this comment
J.D.
Jun 24, 2009 10:49 AM CST
Heidi, your political instincts—and lack of intellectual curiosity which apparently stopped you from clicking the link to the LA Times article—are misleading you.
Yes, she is a minority and likely a beneficiary of Affirmative Action. The question remains: what happened to numbers 1, 2, and 3?
And since when does being homeless and one’s mom getting pregnant at age 14 have ANYTHING to do with intellect or ability? The Times writer did not mention her SAT score—I’d be curious to see it. Then we could have a better discussion.
If it’s low, this social program might be setting her up for failure, which is very sad.
Flag this comment
Leisa
Jun 24, 2009 11:04 AM CST
Who (besides J.D.) cares what her ethnicity is? I am betting numbers 1 through 3 are pretty happy they did not have to compete with number 4 from a homeless shelter, alley or whever the beautiful, brilliant and driven Ms. Williams found to sleep and study.
Flag this comment
Leisa
Jun 24, 2009 11:07 AM CST
Ooops. . . I meant to type ‘wherever’. I sure am glad I did not have to compete with number 4 (at least in typing class) when I graduated number 1. LOL
Flag this comment
Disgusted
Jun 24, 2009 11:18 AM CST
Let me guess, posters 2, 4 and 5 are Caucasian and grew up in either middle class or upper class families with all the comforts. (Although, I’m sure they consider themselves abused as children when they didn’t get the newest fashions and toys.) Even with all the advantages of growing up white, however, these posters probably slacked off, had poor work ethic, lacked talent, and were/are all-around not very nice human beings. So, who to blame for their lack of notable success in life? Why, all the minorities who are being advanced through affirmative action, of course. Because of course, a mediocre, lazy white person with a chip on his shoulder should receive preferance over an average minority who has climed mountains just to be able to get to average. I would take the “C” minority student who fought every day of her life to be a “C” student because it was THAT important to her over the “B” white student who could have easily been an “A” student had he given a #$%. And so would most employers. It’s not always about affirmative action. Sometimes it’s just about character.
Flag this comment
DR
Jun 24, 2009 11:49 AM CST
I read this article this morning and I knew it would only be a matter of time before the affirmative action squad stepped in to diss this girl’s accomplishments. Poor white person achieves success and well, by golly, he/she pulled themselves up their bootstraps. Poor, minority homeless girl, who was deemed gifted at age nine (mostly likely at an age where affirmative action rules don’t apply) likely only achieved her success through affirmative action. I mean, I know its hard to wrap your head around the concept that a nine year old minority girl might be gifted and might continue to excel into her adult life. I know it’s hard to understand that someone, despite all odds (homelessness being one of them) can rise up overcome crappy circumstances. But people don’t like to hear that if it clouds the validity of their own agenda.
And I agree with the premise of No. 8 above. People who want to succeed in life do it no matter what the odds (affirmative action or no). People who lack that drive or ability simply sit back and either blame the system or blame those who have succeeded.
Flag this comment
Heidi O
Jun 24, 2009 12:48 PM CST
JD: It wasn’t lack of intellectual curiosity that kept me from clicking the link to the article, merely a prioritization of my work-day and not really giving a rats @#$ what the race of the student is. Frankly, I didn’t give a thought to the student’s race until I read the comments about affirmative action. Having now followed the link, I see that her accomplishments are in fact based on merit. Joe is indeed making racial assumptions when he says, “Did the white girl who was number 3 in the class get rejected from Harvard so this minority could get in?” What white girl that was #3? Perhaps the top 4 were all black?
Do you know the difference between challenging someone’s assumptions (i.e., “the photographs in the article clearly show that she is a minority”) and labeling them dismissively? (“your political instincts—and lack of intellectual curiosity…are misleading you”). Perhaps you don’t care.
I am much more concerned about the fact that numbers 1, 2, and 3 may have been squeezed out of Yale by legacy admissions (i.e. some of the descendants of Prescott Bush, who had clearly inadequate academic credentials) than that they may have been beaten out by someone who actually merits the position.
Flag this comment
J.D.
Jun 24, 2009 12:49 PM CST
Hey, perhaps she’s a genius. She could have scored in the top 95 percentile on the SATs. Unfortunately, we don’t have those numbers which were suspiciously absent from the article.
But we do know that Affirmative Action reared its ugly, racist head during the application process.
Why not just let people compete on their merits? Why do we need to assign bonus points based on physical appearance?
And to #8, you sure are sounding like a racist in your assumptions. There are are a hell of a lot more poor white folks than poor black people in the country. If you think a white person growing up in a Oklahoma trailer park is some how “advantaged’ and “lazy” then you’ve been brainwashed by your educators.
I don’t believe in stereotypes like you do; that’s why I oppose affirmative action (which is based on stereotypes) and why you are able to easily make asinine statements.
Flag this comment
J.D.
Jun 24, 2009 12:52 PM CST
Heidi—Of course legacy admissions are wrong. Just like Affirmative Action, they don’t result in applicants being judged on merit, grades, or SAT and LSAT scores.
Again, can’t we just look at a person’s academic credentials? Can’t we do away with judging people based on race and their parents’ standing?
Or is this too fair of a proposal?
Flag this comment
Heidi O
Jun 24, 2009 1:22 PM CST
Merit is exactly what it comes down to. The article clearly states facts that demonstrate her merit.
The article is an inspiring story about a young woman who managed to develop her academic gifts despite what many others in similar positions have found to be insurmountable odds. It became a discussion about affirmative action based on assumptions that because she is a minority she can’t possibly be qualified to attend Harvard unless she has received some special consideration or benefit.
I shall now return to work because someone is going to have to pay the mortgage (I have no idea where some of you get the time to continually monitor and comment on these articles. Do you have independent means of support? How does one acquire such a thing?)
Flag this comment
hal
Jun 24, 2009 2:05 PM CST
First, I congratulate Khadijah on her accomplishment. It is the success she has achieved so far, despite where she began on that road that demonstrates that she will be successful at Harvard. To achieve that with so many holes in her basic education demonstrates she is either smart enough, hard working enough, or likely both to achieve at Harvard.
Everyone knows that people with money and connections tend to benefit at the expense of others. For example, whose place do you think George W. Bush “took” when he got into some of the schools he attended?
For example, the University of Illinois has a scandal going on where various trustees apparently sought to get various people in the school that were not otherwise qualified. This is especially egregious because taxpayer’s money fund this public institution.
I know that some minorities who feel like they got in to certain schools without the need of any preference, often felt like others assumed they only got in because they were a minority.
In any event, I don’t believe race or ethnicity should be a major determining factor.
However, I do believe that there should be some room to acknowledge that people who overcame circumstances to achieve a measure of success before entering college, will likely continue to achieve the same sort of success because they worked hard enough and were smart enough to overcome such diversity.
There are many white kids, take appalacia for instance, that grow up without money, power, or privilege. Such kids could use a hand up. Likewise there are miniorities that grow up privileged and have connections, that don’t need an extra hand.
I believe there should be preferences, but perhaps the majority should be based upon criteria other than race or ethnicity. Such color blind would allow some amount of sliding preference for minorities and others who grow up in less than privilege to get a bit of a hand up in recognition of the obsticles they have overcome. For example, criteria might include the amount of money your parents have, how much they have earned over their lifetime, the educational level of your parents, the percentage of kids in you school that at least begin college, the crime rate in your neighborhood, the educational level in your neighborhood, and possibly other statistics that are already kept by cities, states, and the federal government.
I also note that sometimes people assume that just because you are caucasion, you automatically grew up with lots of money and privilege. That is not the case.
Flag this comment
person
Jun 24, 2009 4:25 PM CST
#8,
How the h-ll did you get all that from my noting the gripefest this was going to turn into?
Oh wait, my driver is here. He’s going to take me and the chip on my white shoulder to the country club so I can commiserate with the other whiteys about how rough it is being white. While drinking old Scotch. Life sucks.
Flag this comment
blacklawyer
Jun 24, 2009 6:09 PM CST
LMAO!!! You people are nuts!
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Jun 27, 2009 1:10 AM CST
I’ll tell you one thing - at Harvard, this kid will see some of the spiffiest restrooms she’s ever seen in her life. She will be able to truthfully say, “I have lived in numerous places that are not as nice as these (very) upscale restrooms.”
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.