Caption: This diorama is respectfully dedicated to the oral argument analogies of Justice Breyer—and Peeps in Law! Five recent cases are shown. Mr. Crook (the gingerbread peep, Loughrin v. US, 13-316, tr. p. 22) rides a white horse across Branko’s Bridge in Yugoslavia, establishing his alibi (Navarette v. California, 12-9490, tr. p. 33). He intends to defraud King Tut’s paymaster (Alice Corp v. CLS Bank, 13-298, tr. p. 6) peeps, who will give goods and gold for a $5000 check, though Mr. Crook has only $32 in his account. Although the paymasters’ goods include exactly five carrots—the grounds of 42 USC 2000e-2(m)—there is only one beet, the 1991 amendment (Univ of Texas SW Medical Center v. Nassar, 12-484, tr. p. 35). A South African Yellow Canary (as a matter of law) eraser peep rests on the flagpole (Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz, 13-854, tr. p. 18).
Designed, built, and written by Eric J. O’Denius of Burnsville, Minnesota, amateur Court watcher and professional law nerd. Moral encouragement and technical support provided by Christian and Dan Pornschloegl, DeNae Leverentz, and the Pretty Deadly trap shooting team of Blaine, Minnesota.
Attribution: Submitted by Eric J. O'Denius of Burnsville, Minnesota