Law Firms
‘Bitterness and Anger’ Aimed at Thacher Managers Over Partner Losses
Posted Jan 20, 2009 8:47 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
A former partner at the dissolved law firm Thacher Proffitt & Wood says there is “a lot of bitterness and anger” directed at former managers of the law firm.
The former partner told The Lawyer that partners are facing losses in the millions of dollars as a result of the dissolution. Some are angry that the firm’s former managing partner, Paul Tvetenstrand, is one of 100 lawyers who have landed new jobs at Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal.
In an interview with The Lawyer, Tvetenstrand defended his actions and also addressed rumors about increased partner capital contributions and decreased distributions before the firm shut down.
“We fought tooth and nail to save the firm,” Tvetenstrand told the publication. “If we hadn’t got this deal done, there was really nothing else going on.” He said Thacher partners even offered to take pay cuts if Sonnenschein would take on additional Thacher associates, but Sonnenschein refused.
Tvetenstrand addressed the partner compensation rumors this way:
• Did the law firm use credit lines to pay 2007 partner bonuses and distributions? “Not in any way that was different from any other year in order to meet the regular cash-flow needs.”
• Did the law firm ask partners to make additional capital contributions last January amounting to about $500,000 for some partners? The amount sought was “nothing extraordinary, but over the past three years we had an annual increase to fund the build-out of floors.”
• Did the law firm hold back partner profits in amounts ranging from $150,000 to $250,000? There was not an increase in the amount held back, “though some people voluntarily left some of their 2007 money in the firm. Why? To help the firm.”

Comments
B. McLeod
Jan 20, 2009 9:34 AM CST
Yes, they really needed those annual increases “to fund the build-out of floors.” This should be featured in a “Dilbert” strip.
Flag this comment
A.B.
Jan 24, 2009 1:59 PM CST
Interesting. I worked at 110-lawyer Watson Ess in Kansas City, whose managing partner and presumed fiduciary of the best interests of the firm left with his best clients for Sonnenschein. The firm collapsed soon thereafter. Shouldn’t we (lawyers) expect more from managing partners, acquiring firms and lawyers in general? Not scr*wing over your partners would be a start.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Jan 24, 2009 3:58 PM CST
This is how it is now. “Firms” have become mere loose confederations of “partners” (more aptly, “members”) circling each other with their razors out, as each continually attempts to market his/her “book of business” to another “firm” that will pay more.
Flag this comment
posquant
Jan 25, 2009 2:18 AM CST
Eh? Why such surprise that lawyers go around screwing each other? Are they only supposed to screw the other side, in litigation? But, if you are a method actor and trained sophist ... how would you know when to stop playing the part? Once you cross that line ...how would you know when your were deceiving yourself, or anyone else?
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.