Animal Law

Federal Judge Allows Circus's Racketeering Suit Against Animal Rights Groups

A federal judge is allowing a racketeering case filed by the parent company of the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus against a coalition of animal rights groups.

U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan ruled earlier this week on behalf of corporate parent Feld Entertainment Inc., according to The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times. Feld’s suit claims the animal rights coalition violated the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act when it paid a former Ringling Brothers trainer who was a plaintiff along with the groups in a prior suit against the circus alleging that elephants were mistreated.

Sullivan dismissed the prior suit in 2009, saying the trainer was “essentially a paid plaintiff and fact witness” whose only source of income during the litigation was provided by the animal advocacy organizations.

Sullivan’s July 9 opinion (PDF) said litigation activities alone can’t support a RICO claim. In this case, however, Feld is alleging an entire lawsuit was based on bribery of the lead plaintiff and witness, the judge wrote.

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy and the ABA Code of Conduct.

Commenting is not available in this channel entry.