President's Message

The Blessings of Brown

  • Print.

On May 17, 1954, the U.S. Su­preme Court in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka overturned the 1896 Plessy v. Fer­guson decision and declared that “separate but equal facilities” were unconstitutional.

The Brown decision not only formally deseg­regated public schools but also laid the foun­da­­­tion for the 1960s civil rights movement. It was a revolutionary mo­ment in American jurisprudence that continues to affect our lives today.

A tremendous debt is owed to the exemplary law­yers of the National Association for the Advancement of Col­ored People who won this landmark case, such as Robert Carter, Con­stance Baker Motley and, of course, Thurgood Mar­shall. They were in turn indebted to Charles Ham­il­ton Hous­ton, the architect of the legal strategy that led up to Brown, who unfor­tu­nate­ly did not live to witness the moment of victory.

Although Brown ended legal discrimination, there was more to be done to advance educational opportunity for people who had been locked out and to bridge the wide canyon of economic inequity between blacks and whites. In the years after Brown, and as a justice on the Supreme Court, Marshall became a powerful advocate of affirmative action as a remedy for the damage caused by the nation’s history of slavery and racial bias. Recognizing the gulf between the letter and spirit of the law, he stated, “A child born to a black mother in a state like Miss­issippi … has exactly the same rights as a white baby born to the wealthiest person in the United States. It’s not true, but I challenge anyone to say it is not a goal worth working for.”


Brown was the beginning of the trajectory that brought us to last summer’s Supreme Court decision in favor of the University of Michigan Law School’s admission policy. It recognized that consideration of race in law school admissions is allowable because diversity, in its own right, is a compelling state interest. In her opinion, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor wrote, “Effec­tive participation by members of all racial and ethnic groups in the civic life of our nation is essential if the dream of one nation, indivisible, is to be realized.”

It is clear that the decision will have profound implications for legal education and the future of the profession. Justice O’Connor also wrote that she expected that “ra­cial preferences will no longer be necessary in 25 years.” I pray that she is right.

The ABA Commission on Brown v. Board of Education, led by Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree Jr., has been developing programs and materials to commemorate this landmark decision and create an enduring collection of resources that will continue to educate Ameri­cans about Brown and its legacy in the years to come. The commission, in conjunction with the ABA Divi­sion for Public Edu­ca­tion, the Judges Network of the Ju­dicial Division and the Media Relations Division, is working with high schools nationwide to create di­alogues on Brown. We want young people to learn what the ruling meant and how it works today. (For more, see “Brown at 50,” page 38.)

Also, at the end of April the commission will partner with the National Constitution Center in Phila­delphia to conduct a Fred Friendly-style seminar focusing on Brown. It will feature a moderated panel discussion by experts in various fields responding to hypothetical scenarios constructed around legal, ethical and public policy issues.

The Brown and University of Michigan decisions share a commitment to offering equal educational opportunities for all Americans. Today, as we face new challenges in a global society, including the competitive pressures of a global marketplace, our national commitment to educational excellence for all is imperative. This imperative ex­tends to the legal profession. As our Su­preme Court observed last year in Grutter v. Bollinger, full participation of all racial and ethnic groups in the legal profession preserves the legitimacy of our system and safeguards the in­tegrity and vitality of our democratic government.

Drawing again from Justice Marshall’s words, the true miracle of the Constitution was not its birth but its life. Perhaps no better example of this exists than Brown, which did so much to extend the rights of the Constitu­tion to all whose lives are sheltered and shaped by its meaning.

Give us feedback, share a story tip or update, or report an error.