• Home
  • News
  • 1st Circuit Nixes Webcast of RIAA Hearing

Trials & Litigation

1st Circuit Nixes Webcast of RIAA Hearing

Posted Apr 16, 2009 3:16 PM CST
By Martha Neil

Ruling on a writ of mandamus seeking to quash a federal judge's plan to allow a gavel-to-gavel webcast of a hearing in a hard-fought case over music downloading, the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held today that a webcast falls squarely within an existing ban on cameras in the courtroom.

"We are reluctant to interfere with a district judge's interpretation of a rule of her court, especially one that involves courtroom management," writes a three-judge appellate panel.

But Local Rule 83.3 of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, consistent with other court authority, clearly prohibits the planned webcast, the panel determines.

"In this case, then, all roads lead to Rome," the Boston-based 1st Circuit concludes at the tail end of a 25-page written opinion on the question. "It is perfectly clear that the local rule, the Judicial Conference policy, and the circuit council resolution are cut from the same cloth. We think that they must be construed in pari materia. Separately and collectively, the three statements undermine the district judge's assertion of authority to allow webcasting."

The appellate court had advisory mandamus jurisdiction, the opinion notes, because the question was one that likely would recur again if not decided now.

The webcast dispute is the latest chapter in a high-profile music downloading case brought by the Recording Industry Association of America. Sparks have repeatedly flown since Harvard Law School's Charles Nesson began defending a graduate student against the RIAA's allegations that he illegally downloaded a relatively small number of songs.

Additional coverage:

ABAJournal.com: "1st Circuit Mulls Plan to Webcast Hearing in RIAA Music Downloading Case"

ABAJournal.com: "Harvard Prof Defends Controversial Tactics in Music Downloading Case"

E-Commerce and Tech Law: "First Circuit Shutters Webcast of Tenenbaum Copyright Trial"

Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly: "First Circuit: Webcasting of hearing not allowed"

Comments

1.

J.D.
Apr 16, 2009 3:56 PM CST

Damn. I was planning on downloading it dozens of times and sending it to all my friends. And then I was going to copy it to CDs and sell copies on the street corner.

Flag this comment

2.

Freespeechadvocate
Apr 16, 2009 8:59 PM CST

The concurring opinion in this case is well worth a read.  “[T]here are no sound policy reasons to prohibit the webcasting authorized by [a] District Court.”  “Actually seeing and hearing court proceedings . . . provides a powerful device for monitoring the courts.”  These rules and policies should, indeed, be re-examined.

Flag this comment

3.

Prosecute1966
Apr 30, 2009 10:57 AM CST

These rules are archaic and unnecessary.  It is curious to me that I can view Congress in action on c-span, but I cannot view U.S. a district, appellate, or Supreme Court case via television or computer.  Discreet cameras in the courtroom would do no harm, but they would offer a much needed education to the public.  The courts remain, as always, a mystery to most people.  I have been practicing for 12 years, and I’m constantly amazed at how little John Q. Citizen knows about the state court system, much less the federal system.  The Supreme Court and all lower courts should amend their rules immediately and allow the public to view the court system it pays for.

Flag this comment

Add a Comment

We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.

Commenting has expired on this post.