Legal Ethics
Ex-Toyota Lawyer Alleges Destruction of Evidence in Rollover Suits
Posted Aug 31, 2009 7:43 AM CST
By Debra Cassens Weiss
The former managing counsel for Toyota Motor Sales USA has filed a lawsuit against his former employer alleging the automaker destroyed evidence in hundreds of rollover suits, leading to his mental breakdown and firing.
The racketeering suit by Dimitrios Biller claims Toyota destroyed evidence in a "ruthless conspiracy" to keep the information secret, CBS News reports. Biller, now a discovery and trial consultant, says on his website that he was an associate and partner at Pillsbury Winthrop for 14 years before joining Toyota.
The story says Biller’s suit has “electrified the plaintiffs bar, where some lawyers involved in vehicle cases have long voiced suspicions about foreign automakers withholding evidence.” The suit alleges violation of federal racketeering law, wrongful firing and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
The July 24 suit (PDF), filed in Los Angeles federal court, alleges Toyota destroyed design and test data from an engineering subsidiary and withheld records on design and testing of vehicle roofs, according to the story.
“Mr. Biller repeatedly confronted Toyota executives about the need to turn over the evidence it was concealing and withholding, and was repeatedly told by Toyota executives, including in-house counsel, that Toyota would not comply with its legal duty to do so,” the suit says. Biller was forced to resign while on medical leave due to a mental and physical breakdown caused by Toyota’s “campaign to quiet his efforts,” the suit says.
Toyota alleges the suit contains privileged information and has filed a motion to seal the complaint. The company told CBS that Biller’s charges are “inaccurate and misleading,” and it takes its legal obligations seriously.
“In our view, Mr. Biller has repeatedly breached his ethical and professional obligations, both as an attorney and in his commitments to us, by violating attorney-client privilege." Biller was paid $3.7 million in severance, according to CBS.
Biller's suit also notes he has sued the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office, alleging he was wrongfully fired in a dispute over sheriff's deputies failing to show up for hearings or failing to bring evidence.

Comments
anonymous
Aug 31, 2009 9:09 AM CST
Comment removed by moderator.
Flag this comment
Lincoln
Aug 31, 2009 10:05 AM CST
I’m sorry, but this guy should be disbarred. What Toyota has been doing, if true, is utterly disgusting, but you are supposed to be able to tell your attorney utterly disgusting things and not have that information spread world-wide.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Aug 31, 2009 10:50 AM CST
Perhaps being without much income has contributed to his delayed moral outrage. “Biller.” I love it!
Flag this comment
tim
Aug 31, 2009 11:45 AM CST
Which law firm do you think told Toyota it was ok to do this?
Flag this comment
anonymous
Sep 1, 2009 9:59 AM CST
Toyota should have hired an Indian LPO. They could have hid the sensitive information in a cave in Kashmire.
Flag this comment
Raleigh
Sep 4, 2009 5:59 AM CST
“$3.7 Million in severance”!!!!!!!! Sounds more like hush money than severance; looks like Toyota is not getting the benefit of its bargain.
Flag this comment
B. McLeod
Sep 4, 2009 8:02 AM CST
I am surprised he did not go further in BigLaw. I would think they would have enjoyed telling client reps, “Please wait here. My colleague, Biller, will take care of you.
Flag this comment
AndytheLawyer
Sep 4, 2009 9:14 AM CST
That’s the problem with America today. No matter what you pay to buy silence. it doesn’t stay bought.
Flag this comment
Kalifornia Arnold
Sep 4, 2009 9:21 AM CST
Did they expect the Toyota lawyer to just roll over?
Flag this comment
Little Al
Sep 4, 2009 3:20 PM CST
To No. 2.: There is no ethical violation by Biller for disclosing Toyota’s efforts to conceal evidence. A lawyer, however, may not permit a client to submit false information to a court, and as an officer of the court, has a duty to disclose frauds upon the court. If Toyota signed affidavits in answers to interrogatories saying that’s all the information they had, the lawyer had a duty to disclose that. (i.e. if a client tells lawyer “I’m going to murder someone” there is no privilege and lawyer may disclose such) Further, any employee has a “whistle blower” case in most states, which necessarily brings the purported illegal activity of the employer to public light. And, when there are suits between attorneys and clients, such as in malpractice claims, the privilege is generally gone. This is to work both ways. Many courts have recognized that a lawyer may not be asked to aid or perform illegal activity by a client. Plainly there is no privilege as to that.
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.