Trials & Litigation
‘Little Eichmanns’ Prof Wins Case, Is Awarded One Dollar
Posted Apr 2, 2009 5:45 PM CST
By Martha Neil
A controversial former ethnic studies professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder has won his wrongful dismissal case against his former employer after a state court jury apparently found that Ward Churchill's termination was because of his political views. But the jury awarded Churchill only $1 in damages.
Nonetheless, the $1 award means that the university likely will have to pay Churchill's attorney fees, the Associated Press reports. And Churchill, 61, could still be reinstated to his job by Chief Denver District Judge Larry Naves, who has yet to decide this issue, according to the New York Times.
Both sides proclaimed at least a partial victory after news of the jury verdict this afternoon:
"I didn’t ask for money, I asked for justice,” Churchill said when questioned about the $1 award, adding that he expects to get his job back. "Reinstatement would follow rather, nicely, wouldn't you say?" he asked rhetorically.
A university spokesman describes the $1 award as "some vindication" and says Colorado will oppose reinstatement, the newspaper reports.
Churchill was reviled for a Sept. 12, 2001 essay in which he described financial workers at the center of the World Trade Center terrorist attack the previous day as “little Eichmanns,” referring to the Nazi leader Adolf Eichmann, one of the architects of the Holocaust, the Times recounts.
At issue in the trial was whether Churchill was unlawfully dismissed for his political views, or, as the university claimed, because he had falsified and plagiarized his academic work.
Additional coverage:
9News (NBC): "Churchill wins case, $1 in damages "
Colorado Daily (March 31): "Judge dismisses one of Churchill's two claims"

Comments
J.D.
Apr 2, 2009 8:49 PM CST
So we can’t fire someone for being an idiot?
He claims it’s his “political views” that were discriminated against. What if his political views were akin to nazism? We couldn’t fire him?
Flag this comment
Christopher
Apr 3, 2009 12:22 AM CST
I was present at one of Churchill’s speeches at my university in 2004. I can say without reservation that he is the biggest jack@$$ that I have ever heard open his mouth. To say he is an idiot would be an insult to idiots. He was asked about his comments regarding the September 11 victims and couldn’t back them up then either. His academic “speech” was supposed to be about the portrayal of native americans. It quickly degenerated into a hate speech about white people where he used about every offensive four letter word in the dictionary. 3 minutes into it he was yelling at his audience and ranting like a madman.
I thought the university of colorado did itself a favor when they fired this idiot as he was making their institution look foolish every time he opened his mouth, or from the sound of it put a pen to paper to copy another’s work. The other rumor going around at the time was that the native american tribe that he was claiming to be a member of denied that he was one of them. Wouldn’t surprise me if he lied about that as well.
Have a pepsi for your trouble Ward… you’ve earned it.
Flag this comment
fed up
Apr 3, 2009 1:03 PM CST
Congratulations Professor Churchill. Your description of the financial workers at the center of the World Trade Center terrorist attack as “little Eichmanns” proved eerily clairvoyant, given the bigger Eichmanns revealed during the last six months in New York City, such as A.I.G. and the Wall Street crowd. I nominate you for The Presidential Medal of Freedom. Next I encourage you to take on the legal profession, which was actually responsible for the Holocaust.
Lawyers legally created the “final solution” that was the Holocaust. It began with the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, the so-called blood and honor laws. The final solution was further refined at the Wannsee conference on January 20, 1942, near Berlin. Adolf Eichmann was the architect of the Holocaust at Wannsee with Reinhard Heydrich presiding. Some of the lawyers who attended the Wannsee conference were Dr. Wilhelm Stuckart, Erich Neumann, Josef Bühler, Roland Freisler, Rudolf Lange, Gerhard Klopfer. Why did American lawyers or law organizations fail to object? Probably because they supported similar blood and honor laws in the US, the anti-miscegenation laws which inspired the Nuremberg Laws.
Professor Churchill’s message is legitimate, even if his delivery needs polish.
Flag this comment
J.D.
Apr 6, 2009 11:40 AM CST
^ Prof. Churchill?
Flag this comment
Add a Comment
We welcome your comments, but please adhere to our comment policy.
Commenting has expired on this post.