Federal judge blocks remain-in-Mexico policy for asylum-seekers
Photo by nito/Shutterstock.com.
A federal judge in San Francisco has blocked a Trump administration policy that generally requires asylum-seekers to remain in Mexico as they await their hearings.
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg issued a preliminary injunction Monday, report the Washington Post, the New York Times, Courthouse News Service and a press release by the American Civil Liberties Union.
The ruling comes a day after the resignation of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen. President Donald Trump also has pulled the nomination of Ron Vitiello to lead the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, part of his push to toughen immigration enforcement.
Seeborg said the Immigration and Nationalization Act doesn’t authorize the policy, known as Migrant Protection Protocols, as applied to people who arrive here without proper documentation.
Even if the policy is allowed by statute, it doesn’t have sufficient safeguards to comply with the Department of Homeland Security’s legal obligation not to return migrants to a territory where their lives or freedom would be threatened, Seeborg said.
As a result of those deficiencies, the policy violates the Administrative Procedures Act, Seeborg said.
A press release and policy memorandum had said the government was implementing the policy under Section 235 of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The provision says people entering the country illegally “from a foreign territory contiguous to the U.S.” may be returned “to that territory pending a [removal] proceeding.”
Seeborg said federal law divides entering migrants into two groups. One category includes those who arrive without specific travel and identification documents, making them subject to expedited removal. The second category consists of migrants who are clearly eligible for admission to the United States or whose application for admission will be evaluated by an immigration judge.
The contiguous territories provision does not apply to the first category, Seeborg said. The eleven asylum-seekers who were individual plaintiffs in the lawsuit all arrived without valid admission documents and are therefore not subject to the contiguous territories provision, Seeborg said.
Seeborg said Congress could authorize the return of such migrants to Mexico if further procedural protections ensured that the migrants would not be returned “to unduly dangerous circumstances.”
Seeborg’s injunction prevents the government from implementing and expanding the remain-in-Mexico policy.
Seeborg said his injunction doesn’t take effect until April 12 to allow the federal government time to seek a stay of his injunction.
Seeborg ruled in a suit filed by the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center and the Center for Gender & Refugee Studies. The plaintiffs are 11 asylum-seekers who were forced to wait in Mexico, as well as six immigrant-rights nonprofit organizations.
The case is Innovation Law Lab v. Nielsen.
Trump criticized the decision in a tweet.
A 9th Circuit Judge just ruled that Mexico is too dangerous for migrants. So unfair to the U.S. OUT OF CONTROL! https://t.co/XF8o3jMDle— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) April 9, 2019
ABAJournal.com: “US begins sending asylum-seekers at San Ysidro back to Mexico”
ABAJournal.com: “Lawsuit challenges Trump’s remain-in-Mexico policy for asylum-seekers”